摘要
目的建立学生日常社会和学业事件量表(General Social and Academic Hassles Scale,SHS)中文版,并分析其信、效度。方法对1208名大学生进行SHS量表测评,分析量表的内部一致性和重测信度、条目间平均相关系数、总分与各因子间的相关系数,比较SHS与量表CESD和MASQ之间的相关关系,并进行验证性因子分析。结果SHS中文版的Cronbach’sα系数为0.91;重测信度为0.91;条目间平均相关系数在0.09～0.57之间;总分与各因子的相关系数在0.84～0.89之间,各因子间的相关系数在0.58～0.70之间;条目对因子负荷系数在0.25～0.76之间,复相关系数在0.05～0.59之间;验证性因子分析的指标:NFI(0.92)、CFI(0.91)、GFI(0.97)、NNFI(0.94)、REMEA(0.06)均符合测量学要求,与量表CESD、MASQ之间存在显著相关关系。结论SHS中文版具有良好的信、效度,在我国也是一种较好的学生日常应激的评估工具。
Objective To develop the Chinese version of General Social and Academic Hassles Scale （SHS） and examine its relia- bility and validity. Methods A sample of 1208 undergraduate students werer tested. We examined the Chinese version of the SHS＇s internal reliability and test-retest reliability. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we tested the three-factor model. Results The Cronbach＇ s a coefficient of the SHS was 0.91; The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.91 ; The mean interitem correla- tion coefficients ranged from 0. 09 to 0.57; The correlation coefficients of the three factors with the total scale score ranged from 0.84 to 0. 89, The correlation coefficients among the three factors ranged from 0.58 to 0.70; The factors loadings ranged from 0. 25 to 0. 76. The squared multiple correlations were 0.05 to 0. 59. NFI （0. 92）, CFI （0. 91）, GFI （0. 97） ,NNFI （0.94） and RE- MEA（0. 06） all met the criteria standards for adequacy. Conclusion The Chinese version of the SHS was a reliable and valid mea- sure for assessing stress in Chinese -speaking samples.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2009年第7期876-879,共4页
China Journal of Health Psychology
