期刊文献+

六盘山生态旅游区典型植被对人类旅游践踏干扰的敏感性研究 被引量:7

The Sensitivity of Different Vegetations in Liupan Ecological Tourist Sites to Tourist Activities
原文传递
导出
摘要 生态系统对人类活动的承受能力是土地管理的一个核心问题,一般情况下旅游活动与自然环境保护间存在着明显的冲突。本研究结合六盘山人类旅游活动季节性规律,以野荷谷、小南川、梁殿峡3个核心景区中易受旅游干扰的典型植被类型为对象,在植物初春萌芽(5月)至生物量最大期(8月)通过践踏实验,模拟典型植被类型和主要植物物种对人类旅游践踏的敏感性(相对敏感性和绝对敏感性),并构建三类(抗性、耐性和弹性)指数进行定量表征。研究结果表明:①从3种植被类型的相对敏感性看,其植被类型的抗性、耐性和弹性间具有一致性,其大小顺序为梁殿峡高山草甸植被>野荷谷华北落叶松林下植被>小南川乔灌草植被,3种植物类型抗性分别为59.62%、37.86%、14.16%,耐性指数为90.51%、84.217%、26.80%,弹性指数为78.017%、66.04%、15.35%;②从各植被类型组成物种的绝对敏感性看,小南川景区表现最为敏感,消失物种最多(6种),野荷谷次之(5种),梁殿峡最少(2种);三个景区中消失物种主要为山荆子、龙牙草、华北落叶松幼苗、李幼苗、莓叶委陵菜和豆科野豌豆;③研究结果表明,处于初春萌芽阶段的景区植物幼苗,对人类践踏具有高度的敏感性,旅游践踏不仅当时造成部分植物消亡,也对植物后续的生长产生较大负面作用,进而影响到旅游区生态系统正常的发展演替。 The carrying capacity of ecological system is a core problem for the land management, because there is a obvious conflict between tourism activities and natural environment. Three typical vegetations, which are edelweiss meadow in Liangdianxia, larch in Yehegu and ?? in Xiaonanchuan, are selected in this paper, since these are the core tourism areas in Liupan Mountain Reserve. Tourism activities simulation is conducted from the sprout period in spring (in May) to the period with maximum biomass (in August) to study the dynamical responses of the three vegetation types. Experimental treading is conducted upon the three vegetation types in five separate mountain regions. Each type is tread upon for 0-500 times. Vegetation responses to the treading are assessed by evaluating the vegetation cover 2 weeks after and three months after the treading tests. Based on the changes of vegetation cover in the different stages, the sensitivity of three vegetations to the tourist activities can be evaluated by three indices, which are the tolerance index, the resistance index and the elasticity index. The results of this study show that: 1) In terms of relative sensitivity, all the sensitivity indices respond consistently. The sensitivity level ranking of the three vegetations is: Liangdianxia ranks first and Xiaonanchuan is the last. However, vegetation in Xiaonanchuan is especially sensitive to human treading. 2) In terms of absolute sensitivity, the species in the three regions have different vegetation level and therefore, the sensitivity level is different too. The sensitivity level in Xiaonanchuan ranks first, because nearly 6 species disappear in the treading test period. The number of disappeared species in the Yehegu is 5 and in Liangdianxia, it is 2. The disappeared species in the three regions are mainly Baccatae, Agrimonia L. baby, Prunus padu, Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb of Rosaceae and Vicia sepium Linn of Leguminosae. Also, the coverage rate of some other species reduces due to the treading. These results are useful for the tourism management in Liupan Mountain reserve. Frequent tourist activities can destroy the sprouts of plants and can directly impact the evolution of the species.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期1447-1453,共7页 Resources Science
基金 六盘山生态旅游区敏感景观对人类旅游活动干扰的响应研究(编号:40501074)
关键词 六盘山 敏感性 抗性指数 耐性指数 弹性指数 Liupan Mountain Sensitivity Resistance index Tolerance index Elasticity index
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Cole, D.N. Experimental trampllng of vegetation. I. Relationship between trampling intensity and vegetation response[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1995,32 : 203-214.
  • 2Hector Ceballos-Lascurain. Tourism, Ecotourism and Protected Area[M]. Switzerland: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), 1996.
  • 3Burden R F,P F Randerson. Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1972,9:439-457.
  • 4Willard, BE, Cooper, D J, Forbes, BC. Forbes. Natural regeneration of alpine tundra vegetation after human trampling: A 42-year data set from Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, U.S.A.[J]. Arctic,Antarctic and Alpine Research, 2007,39( 1 ) : 177-183.
  • 5Cole, D. N., Bayfield, N. G. Recreational trampling of vegetation :Standard experimental procedures[J]. Biological Conservation, 1993,63 : 209-215.
  • 6Wagar, J.A. The carrying capacity of wild lands for recreation[M]. Washington,DC: Society of American Foresters, 1961.
  • 7Monz, C.A., Meier, G.A., Buckley, R. C., et al. Responses of moist and dry arctic tundra to trampling and warmer temperatures[J]. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 1996,77(3 ) : 311.
  • 8Cole, D.N. Experimental trampling of vegetation. II. Predictors of resistance and resilience[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1995, 32: 215-224.
  • 9Bayfield, N.G. Recovery of four montane heath communities on Cairngorm, Scotland, from disturbance by trampling[J]. Biological Conservation, 1979, (15) : 165-179.
  • 10Cole D N. Disturbance and recovery of trampled Montana grassland and forests in Montana[R]. Ogden, Utah:. USDA Forest Service,Research paper INT 389,1988.

二级参考文献28

  • 1张金屯.山西五台山嵩草(Kobresia)草甸的初步研究[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),1989,12(3):353-360. 被引量:15
  • 2Nath B 吕永龙译.环境管理[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1991.579-582.
  • 3刘鸿雁,生态学杂志,1994年,14卷,3期,36页
  • 4肖笃宁,景观生态学(译),1990年,12页
  • 5鲍显诚,植被生态学的目的和方法(译),1975年
  • 6楚义芳,旅游的空间经济分析,1992年,114页
  • 7吕永龙(译),环境管理,1991年,579页
  • 8BURDEN,R.F.and RANDERSON,P.F.Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1972,9:439~457.
  • 9刘儒渊.游客践踏对塔塔加地区植群冲击之研究[J].台大实验林研究报告,1992,6(4):45-61.
  • 10COLE,D.N..Estimating the susceptibility of wildland vegetation to trailside alternation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1978,15:281 ~286.

共引文献214

同被引文献144

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部