期刊文献+

美国教育战略重塑与维护霸权的国家意向 被引量:3

On the Remolding of Educational Strategies in the U. S. and National Intention to Keep Hegemony
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自上个世纪80年代之后,美国制定了一系列国家教育战略,1983年美国国家高质量教育委员会发表了《国家处在危险中:教育改革势在必行》这一战略性报告之后,又制定了"2061"计划。进入90年代,随着世界格局的变化,3位总统都高度重视教育:老布什总统签发了《美国2000年教育战略》,克林顿总统以法律的形式确定了美国2000年教育战略的8项目标,小布什总统提出了"不让一个孩子掉队"的主张。这一系列教育战略的核心思想是解决教育尤其是普通教育阶段质量低下的问题,企图通过提高学生课业标准、加强科学教育、实现教育公平、培养学生坚定品格等措施,实现教育的"全面卓越"。其目的是把一个强大的美国带入21世纪进程。 Since the end of the 1980s, the U. S. government has made a series of national educational strategies to solve the problems in education. In 1983, the USA National High - Quality Education Committee issued a series of strategic reports such as The Country is in Danger: The Education Reform is Imperative , and also made the 2061 plan. In the 1990s, the three presidents have been always paying great attention to education: President Bush issued "The Strategy of the United States Education in 2000", President Clinton have made the 8 strategic objectives for the United States in 2000 in the form of law w President George W. Bush proposed the idea of "No Child Left Behind". The core idea of this series of educational strategies is that, in general, to solve the problems of primary and middle school education. The government tries to achieve the country's "educational excellence" by means of raising its course criteria, improving its scientific educations realizing its educational justness, and cultivating the students' staunch characters etc. All these measures are supposed to bring the strong America into the 21st century successfully.
作者 孙大廷
出处 《东北亚论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期122-128,F0003,共8页 Northeast Asia Forum
基金 全国教育科学重点课题"欧美大学学术组织及学术权力模式比较研究"(DLA080130)
关键词 美国教育 科学文化 霸权企图 教育战略 教育立法 国家竞争力 “2061”计划 教育卓越 American Education Scientific Culture Hegemonic Intention Educational Strategy Educational Legislation National Competitive Capacity "2061" Plan Educational Preeminent
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Torsten Husen, Are Standards in U.S. Schools Really Lagging Behind Those in Other Countries, Phi Delta Kappan, 1983:455 - 461.
  • 2姚丽霞,洪明.美国真的处于危险中吗?——20世纪80年代以来美国教育改革主旨探析[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(1):145-150. 被引量:8
  • 3朱军.冷战时期的美苏关系[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:74.
  • 4Stephen Oliner, The Resurgence of Growth IN the Later 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000.14,(4) : 3 -22.
  • 5A.N.怀特海.科学与近代世界[M].商务印书馆,1959:1.
  • 6刘昌明,郭彧.美国的不完全霸权与东亚地区秩序的转型[J].东北亚论坛,2008,17(3):42-47. 被引量:4
  • 7宋来惠.《克林顿总统的教育计划》[J].比较教育研究,1994(5):45-48. 被引量:2
  • 8U.S. DE(2002), U.S. Department of Education[EB/OL]. Strategic Plan2002-2007, http: //www.ed.gov/pubs/strap - lan2002-07/index.html.
  • 9U.S. DE(2001), U.S. Department of Education[ EB/OL]. Strategic Plan2002 -2005,http://www.ed.gov/pubs/straplan2002-05/index.html.
  • 10Leouard M, Bush School Field Tripe Appear to Reflect a Bid for Minorities in Cities[J]. Boston Globe, The (MA), Jan. 11,2004.

二级参考文献47

共引文献35

同被引文献35

  • 1孙家驹.人、自然、社会关系的世纪性思考[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,42(1):113-119. 被引量:37
  • 2陆九渊.陆九渊集[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 3Joseph S. Nye Jr. The challenge of soft power[J]. Time, February22,1999.30.
  • 4[美]汉斯·摩根索.国际纵横策略--争强权求和平[M].卢明华,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1995.90.
  • 5Weiberg, Albert K. Manifest Destiny: A study of Nationalist Expansionism in American History[M]. Chicago: Chicago Press,1935. 240.
  • 6[加拿大]马修·弗雷泽.软实力--美国电影、流行音乐、电视和快餐的全球统治[M].刘满贵,译.北京:新华出版社,2006.298.
  • 7Lisa Andersen. The Paradox of American Power[J]. Policy Science Quarterly, Vol. 117, NO. 3, FaU 2002.
  • 8Josef Joffe. Who's Afraid of Mr. Big[J]. The National Interests, NO. 14, Summer 2001.
  • 9廖言.新自由主义的神话走向破灭[N].光明日报,2009-06-09(10).
  • 10国务院新闻办公室.2007年美国的人权纪录[N].人民日报,2008-03-14(13).

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部