期刊文献+

MEWS对急诊创伤患者临床评估的研究 被引量:23

Clinic study of MEWS on emergency trauma patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价MEWS评分对急诊科成人创伤患者临床评估的适用性和可行性。方法对213例成人创伤患者入急诊科即刻行MEWS评分,追踪其伤情、去向和1月内预后,统计分析MEWS与患者伤情、去向、预后的相关性及临床价值。结果MEWS评分分值与急诊创伤患者伤情、收ICU住院、病死呈正相关。其相关系数r分别为0.635、0.732、0.337。MEWS评分有较准确区分急诊创伤患者是否入住ICU的能力,其AUROCC为0.932,最佳截断值为4分(入急诊科即评分);MEWS评分有中等区分急诊创伤患者可能存活和可能死亡的能力,其AUROCC为0.852,最佳截断值为6(入急诊科即评分)。结论MEWS评分能够适用于对急诊创伤患者快速临床评估,尤其是对合理分流创伤患者有较高的临床价值。 Aim To access the possibility and practicability of MEWS on trauma patients in emergency department.Methods The patients who were hospitalized to emergency department with trauma were enrolled in study in 4 months.All of the 213 patients were evaluated with MEWS instantly when they were sent to emergency department.The severity of trauma,shunt and prognosis within 1 month were followed-up and their relationship,correlation with MEWS were statistical analyzed after dividing into groups retrospectively.Resuits MEWS had positive correlation with the severity of trauma,ICU hospitalization and mortality. Its correlation coefficients were 0. 635,0. 732,and 0. 337 respectively. The MEWS with AUROCC 0. 932 and the best cutoff score 4 had accurate discrimination on ICU hospitalization of emergency adult trauma patients. The MEWS with AUROCC O. 852 and the best cutoff score 6 had moderate discrimi- nation on mortality. Conclusion MEWS can be applied to evaluate quickly the emergency trauma patients, especially in distribution.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2009年第8期913-915,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 MEWS 急诊科 创伤 评分 MEWS RTS emergency department trauma scoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, et al. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions [ J ]. QJM, 2001,94: 521 - 6.
  • 2美国机动车医学促进会(AAAM),重庆市急救医疗中心编译.简明损伤定级标准1990版1998更新本[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2002.30—131.
  • 3Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, et al. The injury severity score : a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care [ J ]. The Journal of trauma, 1974, 14 (3) :187 -96.
  • 4McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A, et al. Confidential inquiry into the quality of care before admission to critical care [ J ]. British Medical Journal, 1998,316 : 1853 - 8.
  • 5McGloin H, Adams S. K, Singer M. Unexpected deaths and referrals to critical care of patients on general wards. Are some cases potentially avoidable? [ J ]. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, 1999,33:255 - 9.
  • 6夏家栋.196例急诊死亡原因分析[J].安徽医药,2007,11(5):435-435. 被引量:12
  • 7孟新科,杨径,吴华雄,朱虹,郑晓英,魏刚,刘德红,苏顺庭.MEWS与APACHEⅡ评分在急诊潜在危重病患者病情评价和预后预测中的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(8):1-4. 被引量:156
  • 8Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al, APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system[ J]. Critical care medicine, 1985,13 (10) :818 -29.
  • 9Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score [ J ]. The Journal of trauma, 1987,27 (4) :370 - 8.
  • 10Champion HR, Cope WS, Sacco WJ, et al. A new characterization of iniury severity[ J]. Trauma, 1990,30:539 -46.

二级参考文献12

共引文献167

同被引文献260

引证文献23

二级引证文献293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部