摘要
为推介中国人民大学法学院博士培养成果,搭建论文品评乃至学术评价之平台,《法学家》专辟"博文精萃"一栏。该栏目由两部分组成:其一是"论文要旨",由博文作者对其博文进行全面系统而重点突出的介绍,一般宜包括如下要素:博文的体系架构;博文每章节的主要内容;博文的主要特点;博文的主要创新和不足;博文所研究领域的课题展望。其二是"论文评议",可以是答辩委员会的论文审查意见,或者评审专家的点评,具体宜包括如下要素:对论文的总体评价;对论文的体系及各章节的评价;对论文创新的评价;指出论文的不足以及进一步完善的方向。敬请关注并提出宝贵建议。
Although institutional designs and its backgrounds vary from country to country,it is a common phenomenon that the ideas,institutions and practices of non-professional judges interact and deviate from each other in the world.This dissertation tries to interpret this phenomenon from the perspective of sociological of law,which puts forward the fundamental theoretical hypothesis focusing on the non-professional judges' potential functions,social requirements and judicial environments.This dissertation not only builds several ideal types based on the historical materials,legal provisions and positive researches of various countries,but also makes great effort to describe and explain the historical changes and the current situation of our people's assessor system.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期148-156,共9页
The Jurist