期刊文献+

高频振荡通气救治新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的观察研究 被引量:1

Outcome of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome treated with high frequency oscillatory ventilation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的疗效。方法分别用高频振荡通气(HFOV)和常频机械通气(CMV)治疗NRDS新生儿,比较治疗前后血气分析指标、机械通气时间、住院时间、治愈率情况。结果 HFOV组患儿在治疗后6 h、12 h氧浓度(FiO_2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO_2)明显下降,氧分压(PaO_2)、PaO_2/FiO_2比值上升明显升高,与CMV对比差异有统计学性意义(P<0.05);HFOV组机械通气时间、住院时间缩短,治愈率增加,与CMV对比差异有统计学性意义(P<0.05)。结论高频振荡通气能改善新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的肺氧合功能,减少并发症,缩短住院时间,降低病死率,较常频机械通气使用更为安全。 Objective To study the outcome of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS) treated with high frequency oscillatory ventilation(HFOV). Methods Newborns with NRDS were treated with HFOV and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) respectively, and the blood gas analysis index, mechanical ventilation time, hospitalization time and curative ratio were compared before and after treatment. Results ( 1 ) Fractional inspired oxygen ( FiO2 ) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide( PaO2 ) were markedly dropped, and FiO2 , PaO2/FiO2 were markedly evelated after 6,12 hours in HFOV group. There was statistical meaning between HFOV group and CMV group ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; (2) The shorter mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time and the high curative ratio were in HFOV group. There was also statistical meaning between HFOV group and CMV group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The HFOV can improve the lung's oxygehation function, reduce hospitalization time and morality, and it is as safe as CMV.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2009年第25期1-3,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
基金 玉林市科技局基金项目(合同编号:玉市科攻0848010)
关键词 高频振荡通气 常频机械通气 呼吸窘迫综合征 前瞻性研究 High frequency oscillatory ventilation Conventional mechanical ventilation Respiratory distress syndrome Prospective studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1周伟.高频振荡通气在新生儿的应用[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(2):135-137. 被引量:41
  • 2戎群芳,黄绮薇,汤定华,张宇鸣.高频通气治疗新生儿重症呼吸衰竭[J].小儿急救医学,2004,11(4):228-230. 被引量:19
  • 3BEN J N,MNIF K,KHALDI A,et al.High-frequency oscil-latory ventilation in term and near-term infants with acute re-spiratory failure:early rescue use[].The American Journal of Perinatology.2006
  • 4Courtney SE,Durand DJ,Asselin JM,et al.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants[].The New England Journal of Medicine.2002
  • 5Johnson AH,Peacock JL,Greenough A,et al.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity[].The New England Journal of Medicine.2002
  • 6Henderson - Smart DJ,Bbuta T,Cools F,et al.Elecive high frequency oscillatory ventilation versua conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[].Cochrane Database Syst Rey.2003

二级参考文献17

  • 1黄绮薇,张宇鸣,张国琴,滕国良,裘刚.高频通气治疗重症新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(1):7-10. 被引量:10
  • 2戎群芳,黄绮薇,汤定华,张宇鸣.高频通气治疗新生儿重症呼吸衰竭[J].小儿急救医学,2004,11(4):228-230. 被引量:19
  • 3R. Plavka, P. Kopecky, V. Sebron, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborn with respiratory distress syndrome[J ]. Intensive Care
  • 4U. Tbome, H. Kussel, G. Lipowsky, et al. Randomized comparision of high- frequency ventilation with high - rate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure [J] .J pediatr, 1999, 135:39 - 46.
  • 5Clank RH, Gerstman DR. Controversies in high - frequency ventilation[ J ]. Clin Perinatol, 1998, 25:113 - 122.
  • 6Paranka MS, Clark RH, Yoder BA, et al. Predictor of Failure of high- frequency oscillatory ventilation in term infant with severe respiratory failure[ J ]. Pediatrics, 1995, 95:400 - 404.
  • 7Clank RH,Gerstman DR.Controversies In high-frequency ventilation.Clin perinatol,1998,25:113-122.
  • 8John H,Arnold MD.High-frequency ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit.Pediatr Crit Care Med,2000,1:93-99.
  • 9Gerstman DR,Minton SD,Stoddard RA,et al.The provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial:improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics,1996,98:1044-1057.
  • 10Plavka R,Kopecky P,Sebron V,et al.A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborn with respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive Care Med,1999,25:68-75.

共引文献55

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部