期刊文献+

基于模糊决策的电力变压器风险评估方法 被引量:18

Risk assessment method of power transformer based on fuzzy decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统风险评估方法存在评价指标等同对待、当风险优先级(RPN)相等时无法进行评估、评估结果准确性低等不足,提出了基于模糊多准则决策的电力变压器风险评估方法,并成功应用于电力变压器故障模式的风险评估。该方法在对电力变压器进行故障模式及影响分析(FMEA)的基础上,选择发生度、严重度和可检测度作为电力变压器的风险评价指标;采用三角模糊数对3项风险评价指标分别进行模糊化处理,运用熵重法确定各评价指标的权重以表现其相对重要度;通过使用模糊多准则决策理论对故障模式进行排序最终得到风险评估结果。评估实例表明,该方法不仅有效地克服了传统评估方法无法实现评价指标的区别对待和当风险优先级(RPN)相等时无法进行评估这两大不足,而且能有效提高评估结果的准确性。 To solve the problems pertaining to traditional risk assessment methods such as non-differential analysis of evaluation indexes, impossibility of risk evaluation with equal risk priority numbers (RPN) and low accuracy of evaluation results, this paper proposes a risk assessment method based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making, which has been successfully employed to evaluate the risk of power transformers. On the basis of the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of power transformer, the occurrence, severity and detectability are chosen as the risk evaluating indexes in this method; the values of these three indexes are respectively fuzzed by using triangular fuzzy number; the weights of the indexes indicating their relative importance are obtained by using entropy method; and the fault modes are sorted by means of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making; finally, the result of risk assessment can be achieved. The assessment results show that the method not only can effectively overcome the defects of traditional assessment methods that are non-differential analysis of evaluation indexes and impossibility of risk evaluation with equal Risk Priority Numbers, but also can effectively improve the accuracy of the assessment results.
出处 《仪器仪表学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期1662-1667,共6页 Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument
基金 重庆市自然科学基金(CSTC 2008BA3026)资助项目
关键词 电力变压器 模糊多准则决策 风险评估 FMEA 三角模糊数 熵重法 power transformer fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making risk assessment FMEA triangular fuzzy number entropy method
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1董玉亮,顾煜炯,杨昆.基于灰色理论和RCM分析的发电设备风险分析[J].动力工程,2004,24(6):798-801. 被引量:8
  • 2梁新元,石庆喜.三角模糊数的模糊因果图研究[J].仪器仪表学报,2006,27(z3):2495-2498. 被引量:6
  • 3BOLANOS M J, LAMATA M T, MORAL S. Decision making problems in a general environment[J]. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 1988,25:135-144.
  • 4CHAN F T S, CHAN H K, KAZEROONI A. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making technique for evaluation of scheduling rules[J].International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2002,20(2): 103-113.
  • 5UANG J W. Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection[C].Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 2008 IEEE Conference on 21-24 Sept. 2008:1281-1284.
  • 6MAHMOODZADEH S, PARIAZAR M, ZAERI M S, et al. Evaluate projects by using multiple criteria decision making techniques[J]. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007:272-276.
  • 7FU Y G. The TOPSIS method of multiple attribute decision making problem with triangular-fuzzy-valued weight[C]. Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, 2008. WMSO' 08, 2008:11-14.

二级参考文献18

  • 1王洪春,张勤.基于因果图的一种近似推理算法[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(8):96-99. 被引量:14
  • 2沈文武,汪成亮,程克非,张勤.因果图转换为信度网的算法[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(10):33-36. 被引量:6
  • 3[1]Qin Zhang.Probabilistic Reasoning based on Dynamic Causality Tree/Diagrams[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1994,46(3):209-220.
  • 4[2]Qin Zhang.A continuous possibility propagation diagram approach for reasoning under uncertainty[A].Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on System,IEEE on Man and Cybernetics[C].Piscataway,NJ,USA,1996,2:1426-1429.
  • 5[5]Shi Qingxi,Wang Hongchun,Zhang Qin.Intelligent fault diagnosis technique based on causality diagram[A].Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation[C].China:Hangzhou,,2004,2(5):1751-1755.
  • 6[6]Wang Chengliang,Shen Wenwu,Chen Kefei,etc.Gibbs Simulation in Causality Diagram[A].The 7th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists[C].China:Hongkong,2003,1 (1):273-277.
  • 7[7]张勤,刘启元,樊兴华,等.面向工业应用的智能开发平台及系统研究[R].重庆市科学技术项目验收报告,2001.
  • 8[11]Dubois D.,Prade H..Fuzzy Sets And System Theory and Application[M].New York:Microelectron Reliability,1980:70-74.
  • 9MoubrayJ.以可靠性为中心的维修[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1995..
  • 10Stamatis DH.Failure mode and effect analysis-FMEA from theory to execution[M].New York:ASQC Quality Press:1995.

共引文献12

同被引文献168

引证文献18

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部