摘要
目的调查研究上海某重点高校研究生抑郁状况。方法随机抽查548名研究生为研究对象,采用流调用抑郁自评量表(CES-D)为测查工具,同时从调查对象个人基本信息、家庭情况、个人经济情况、人际交往情况、个人情绪情感应激等方面开展调查研究,对研究生群体抑郁症进行对比分析。结果上海某重点高校研究生抑郁症检出率为18.6%。家庭来自农村的研究生群体CES-D均分分值高于来自中小城市的研究生,两者有差异(P<0.05);父亲文化程度越低,子女CES-D均值越高;研究生个人经济状况越差,CES-D分值越高;人际交往活跃、经常参加社交活动并与导师联系密切的研究生,以及与同学关系好的研究生,CES-D均分分值愈低;睡眠质量越差,抑郁症状越严重;性别、专业组间均值比较差异不显著。结论上海某重点高校研究生心理健康总体良好,68.6%为无抑郁症状,但仍有相当数量研究生表现出轻、中度以上抑郁情绪。家庭来自农村、父亲文化程度低、个人经济状况差、人际交往被动、睡眠质量不佳的研究生需要特别关注。
Objective To investigate and study depression situations of postgraduates in a certain famous university in Shanghai.Methods A total of 548 postgraduates were investigated,their depression status were evaluated with CES-D. There was a questionnaire designed by the author,including information on person and his family,personal economic situations,human relationship,and emotional fight-or-flight response,etc. Results Depression rate of Postgraduates in the University in Shanghai was 18.6 percent. The mean differences were not significant between genders and majors,but were significant among groups which were classified by father's diploma,postgraduates' economic situations,conditions of postgraduates' human relationships,tested objects' sleeping quality,and among groups which were classified by postgraduates' emotional fight-or-flight response. Conclusion It was not optimistic in depression situations of postgraduates in a certain famous university in Shanghai because there were still many students had depressed psychology though there was no higher rate of depression. Postgraduates,such as coming from countryside,father being poor in learning or illiterate,poor personal economic situations,passive human relationships,and bad sleeping quality,need more attention and concern.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2009年第8期961-963,共3页
China Journal of Health Psychology
基金
东华大学校青年教师科研基金启动项目的研究成果之一