摘要
我国法官角色实际上是一个复杂的角色丛。法官角色多元性导致了法官常会同时受到多种社会角色规范的调整与制约,导致其裁判行为往往围绕着"了断纠纷"展开,努力以"案结事了"结束,而不过分在乎是不是能够呈现完美的"规则之制"。这一法官角色视野下的裁判现象所呈现出的裁判理性,彰显了一种正在东方与西方的法律文化之间穿行超越的裁判理性,表现为裁判文化的融合;揭露了一种仍在传统模式与现代格式之间彷徨徘徊的裁判理性,表现为裁判方式的转变;昭示了一种正艰难地在工具理性与价值理性之间选择取舍的裁判理性,表现为裁判价值的重构。
Actually the essence of the judge's role in China is a role set. There are various kinds of rules to regulate and constrain the judges due to the multiple quality of their role, which will lead them to judge with the focus on "ending the disputes" instead of displaying the improvement of "regulation of rule". The judicial phenomenon, from the perspective of judge's role , shows the judicial rationality produced by the interaction between the eastern and western legal civilization to give expression to the fusion of judicial culture; reveals the kind of judicial rationality lingering between the traditional pattern and the modern one to express a change of judicial pattern; and declare a hard choice between instrument rationality and value rationality to represent the reconstruction of judicial value.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期32-40,共9页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
角色丛
角色失调
角色转换
裁判理性
role set
malfunction of role
change of role
judicial rationality