期刊文献+

应计盈余的计量比较及对资产负债表法的质疑 被引量:5

A Question on Measurement Comparison of Accruable Earnings and the Balance Sheet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从两种计量应计盈余的原理和单一公司比较的基础上论述了采用资产负债表法计量应计盈余存在一定的误差,并用实证的方法将其与现金流量表法下应计盈余的计量进行了比较。实证研究结果表明,无论哪种方法,经营现金流量的持续性均高于应计盈余,但是现金流量表法下的经营现金流量持续性显著强于资产负债表法下的经营现金流量。现金流量表法下的应计盈余、经营现金流量更可靠。 We find that there are some errors in measurement of accruable earnings from the balance sheet by comparing the accrual earnings from the balance sheet with that from the statement of cash flow in theories as well as a single company based on an empirical study. The result indicates that the amount of cash flow from operations has higher persistence than that of accruable earnings regardless of the methods employed. But the former is more persistent than the latter. The accruable earnings and cash flow from operations under the method of the statement of cash flow are more reliable than those under the method of the balance sheet.
作者 纪茂利
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期64-69,共6页 Journal of Audit & Economics
关键词 应计盈余 经营活动现金流量 资产负债表法 计量质疑 比较 分析 accruable earnings cash flow from operations the method of the balance sheet question on measurement comparison analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Richardson S, Sloan R G, Soliman M, Tuna I. Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices [ D ]. University of Michigan Business School,2004.
  • 2Subramanyam K R. The pricing of discretionary accruals [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1996 (2) : 249 - 281.
  • 3Collins, Hribar. Errors in estimating accruals : implications for empirical research[ D]. University of Iowa,2000.
  • 4林翔,陈汉文.增长、盈余管理和应计持续性[J].中国会计评论,2005,3(1):117-142. 被引量:53
  • 5Healy P M. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985 (4) : 85 - 107.
  • 6Jones J. Earnings management during import relief investigationgs[ J]. Journal of Accounting Research,1991 (9) :193 - 228.
  • 7Sloan R G. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? [ J]. The Accounting Review, 1996 ( 3 ) : 289 - 315.
  • 8Richardson S, Sloan R G, Soliman M, Tuna I. Information in accruals about the quality of earnings [ D ]. University of Michigan Business School,2001.
  • 9田静.中国A股上市公司应计质量实证研究[DB].中国优秀博士论文全文数据库.
  • 10彭韶兵,黄益建,赵根.信息可靠性、企业成长性与会计盈余持续性[J].会计研究,2008(3):43-50. 被引量:51

二级参考文献24

  • 1孟焰,袁淳.亏损上市公司会计盈余价值相关性实证研究[J].会计研究,2005(5):42-46. 被引量:70
  • 2王庆文.会计盈余质量对未来会计盈余及股票收益的影响——基于中国股票市场的实证研究[J].金融研究,2005(10):141-152. 被引量:62
  • 3Ahmed, A., Billings, B., and Morton, R.. 2004. Extreme Accruals, Earnings Quality, and Investor Mispricing. Working Paper, Florida State University, 1 -50.
  • 4Beneish, M., and Vargus, M.. 2002. Insider Trading, Earnings Quality, and Accrual Mispricing. The Accounting Review, 77 (4): 755-791.
  • 5Cooper, M., H. Gulen, and M. Schill. 2005. What Best Explains the Cross - Section of Stock Returns - Exploring the Asset Growth Effect. Working Paper, Purdue University, 1 -49.
  • 6Dechow, P.. 1994. Accounting Earnings and Cash Flows as Measures of Firm Performance: The Role of Accounting Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18:3 - 42.
  • 7Dechow, and I. Dichev. 2002. The Quality of Accruals and Earnings : The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement) : 35 - 59.
  • 8Fairfield, P., J. Whisenant, and T. Yohn. 2003. Accrued Earnings and Growth: Implications for Future Profitability and Market Mispricing. The Accounting Review, 78:353 - 371.
  • 9Fama, E. F., and J. D. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. The Journal of Political Economy, 81:607 -636.
  • 10Ijiri, Yuji, and Jaedicke, R. K.. 1966. Reliability and Objectivity of Accounting Measurement. The Accounting Review, July, 476 - 548.

共引文献89

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部