期刊文献+

基于二元不完全偏好的群决策方法 被引量:1

Aggregation approach to bivariate of incomplete preference information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了群决策过程中不完全区间数互反判断矩阵和不完全区间数互补判断矩阵的集成方法。基于决策者给出的允许偏差,定义了群决策满意度隶属函数,建立了求解群体偏好满意程度最大化的权重模型,提出了群体偏好一致性程度的衡量指标,研究了对一致性程度较差的决策者判断进行交互调整的方法。为解决模型存在多组最优解以及因决策者判断误差波动造成的决策误导问题,建立了群体偏好权重分布范围的估计模型。通过算例分析,证明了方法的有效性及实用性。 An aggregation approach to the incomplete complementary comparison matrix is analysed. First, the decision making is defined based on the allowable error interval reciprocal comparison matrix and the interval overall satisfaction membership function of the group given by the decision maker respectively. Following that, a weight model is suggested for finding the maximal degree of the group preference satisfaction. Based on the suggested model, the consistency degree of the group preference is defined. Then, an alternation approach is proposed to improve the judgment of the low consistency degree of the decision-maker. Finally, the weight value distributing region model to estimate the group preference is developed to solve the multi-optimization problem and reduce the misleading decision-making owing to the judgment error. The example indicates the effectiveness and practicablity of the approach.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期1887-1891,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(70701017) 教育部人文社会科学基金(07JC630064)资助课题
关键词 群决策 不完全偏好 判断矩阵 集结 group decision making incomplete preference comparison matrix aggregation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张尧,樊治平.一种基于残缺语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(3):31-35. 被引量:14
  • 2Xu Zeshui. Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion[J].Information Fusion, 2006,7 : 331 - 337.
  • 3孙靖,许维胜,吴启迪.群组决策中残缺判断矩阵的相容性修正及排序新算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(10):88-94. 被引量:11
  • 4朱建军,王梦光,刘士新.不完全判断矩阵的一致性及权重估值模型研究[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(1):75-80. 被引量:3
  • 5Fedrizzi M, Glove S. Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,183:303 - 313.
  • 6Jacinto G, Romero C. Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2001, 28:827 - 834.
  • 7Wang Yingming, Fan Zhiping. Fuzzy preference relations: aggregation and weight determination[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2007, 53 : 163 - 172.
  • 8Gong Zai-Wu. Least-square method to priority of the fuzzy preference relations with incomplete information[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008,47 : 258 - 264.
  • 9Xu Zeshui. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2008, 178: 452-467.
  • 10Kim S, Han C. An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete information[J]. Cornputers & Operations Research , 1999,26 : 755 - 772.

二级参考文献89

共引文献127

同被引文献39

  • 1Chuu S J. Selecting the advanced manufacturing technology using fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making with muhiple fuzzy information[ J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 57 (3) : 1033-1042.
  • 2Ma LiChing. Visualizing preferences on spheres for group decisions based on multiplieative preference relations[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 203 (1): 176-184.
  • 3Cilen YenLiang, Cheng LiChen. An approach to group ranking decisions in a dynamic environalent [ J], Decision Support Systems, 2010, 48(4) : 622-634.
  • 4Eugene D Hahn. Judgmental consistency and consensus in stochastic multicriteria decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(5) : 3784-3791.
  • 5Xu Zeshui. A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitlonistic fuzzy group decision making[ J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(1): 181-190.
  • 6Park K S, Jeong I. How to treat strict preference information in multie-riteria decision analysis[ J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011 , 62 ( 10 ) : 1771-1783.
  • 7Jahaushahloo G R, Zohrehbandian M, Aliuezhad A, Abbasian Naghneh S, Abbasian H, Kiani Mavi R. Finding common weights based on the D M~ preference information[ J ]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011, 62(10) : 1796-1800.
  • 8Yuen K K F. opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: comparisons with pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators[ J ]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011, 18 (5) : 1057-1066.
  • 9Samimi Namin F, Shahriar K, Bascetin A, Ghodsypour S H. FMMSIC: a hybrid fuzzy based decision support system for MMS (in order to estimate interrelationships between criteria) [ J ]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011, 4 (5) : 1022-1034.
  • 10Xu Zeshui, Chen Jian. MAGDM linear programming models with distinct uncertain preference structures[ J]. IEEE Transac- tions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 2008, 38(5) : 1356-1370.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部