毛奇龄《太极图遗义》考辨

Analysis on MAO Qi-ling's Taiji tu yiyi

毛奇龄的《太极图遗议》,是大家在讨论周敦颐与《太极图》的关系时,经常征引的文献。但是,目前学界还缺乏对《太极图遗议》细致的审查。毛氏的立论是否有据,其论证及征引的材料是否准确,都是问题。本文结合各类文献资料,对《太极图遗议》所征引的文献详加审查比对,发现毛氏无论是在行文上,还是在征引前人的文献上,都是不严谨的,甚至有恶意篡改前人文献的例子。我们在征引毛氏的《太极图遗议》时,一定要对其进行学理与文献方面的严格审查。

When discussing about the relation between ZHOU Dun-Yi and Taiji Diagram,we always take MAO Qi-ling s Taiji tu yi yi （Lost Meanings of the Taiji Diagram） as strong evidence. However,studies on MAO s work has been insufficient in academic circle now,such as the support for his arguments and the accuracy of his materials. Reviewing with various references related to that of Taiji tu yi yi,we can find MAO s theory is not precise in both the style of writing and the literatures cited. So,we should give a strict review both in theory and literature before we quote views from the Taiji tu yi yi.