摘要
目的探讨院前与院内联合快速处理急性心肌梗死(AMI)的方法。方法在院前与院内密切配合的情况下,由“120”急诊医师将AMI患者以最快捷的方式直接送入冠心病监护病房(CCU),应用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt—PA)与尿激酶(UK)静脉溶栓治疗,对比分析rt—PA和UK治疗AMI的疗效。结果rt—PA组冠状动脉(冠脉)总再通率明显高于UK组[80.0%(48/60)比59.0%(36/61),P〈0.013;在发病〈3h溶栓治疗中,rt—PA组冠脉再通率也明显高于UK组[88.9%(32/36)比68.4%(26/38),P〈0.053。rt—PA组4周住院病死率明显低于UK组[6.7%(4/60)比13.1%(8/61),P〈0.053。结论rt—PA溶栓疗效优于UK,尤其是在患者发病3h内进行溶栓治疗效果更佳,住院病死率低。
Objective To investigate the combined rapid treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at pre- and hospitalized stage. Methods Under the situation of close association between pre- and hospitalization, " 120" emergency physicians immediately sent patients with AMI directly to the coronary care unit (CCU) in the quickest way, applied recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or urokinase (UK) intravenous thrombolytic therapy for them, analyzed and compared the therapeutic effects between rt-PA and UK for treatment of AMI. Results The total re-canalization rate of coronary artery in rt-PA group was significantly higher than that in UK group [80%(48/60) vs. 59.0% (36/61), P〈0.01] ; in the group the thrombolytic therapy applied within 3 hours after onset of AMI, the total coronary re-canalization rate of rt-PA group was significantly higher than that in UK group [88.9% (32/36) vs. 68.4% (26/38), P〈0.05]; the mortality in 4 weeks during hospitalization in the rt-PA group was significantly less than that in the UK group [6.7% (4/60) vs. 13.1% (8/61), P〈0.05]. Conclusion The thrombolytic action of rt-PA is more effective than that of UK, and the therapeutic effect is particularly better when the former agent is applied within 3 hours after the onset of AMI, and a lower mortality can be obtained during the hospitalization.
出处
《中国中西医结合急救杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2009年第3期140-142,共3页
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
关键词
心肌梗死
重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂
尿激酶
静脉溶栓
院前
myocardial infarction
recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
urokinase
intravenous thrombolysis
pre-hospitalization