期刊文献+

多层次视角下的角色外行为与团队创新绩效 被引量:21

Extra-role Behavior and Team Innovation Performance:A Multilevel Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体层次的角色外行为是通过群体互动和群体规范的作用在团队层次上突现,并形成一定的结构布局,从而影响团队创新绩效的。根据多层次理论,团队层次的行为结构通常用反映集中趋势的均值法与反映离散程度的极值法和方差法等几种操作化方法来表示。通过对59个研发团队的实地调研,发现帮助和建言这两种个体层次的角色外行为同时以组成和汇编的形式在团队层次突现,个体帮助行为在团队内的平均水平与团队创新绩效显著相关,而个体建言行为在团队内的最优水平对团队创新绩效的影响最大,同时,个体帮助行为在团队内的最低水平和个体建言行为在团队内的平均水平也与团队创新绩效显著相关。 In the process of group interaction and by the constraint of group norms, individual extra-role behaviors emerge at team-level and form a certain construct, thereby influencing team innovation performance. According to multilevel theory, team-level behavioral structures are usually operationalized by mean, which reflects central tendency, and by maximum, minimum and variance, which reflect dispersion. Through the empirical study of 59 R&D teams, it was found that individual helping and voice extra-role behaviors aggregated via both composition and compilation forms of emergence. The mean level of individual helping behavior and the maximum level of individual voice behavior had the highest correlation with team innovation performance. The minimum level of individual helping behavior and the mean level of individual voice behavior were also significantly correlated with team innovation performance.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期113-121,共9页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672047)
关键词 多层次理论 角色外行为 团队创新绩效 突现 multilevel theory extra-role behavior team innovation performance emergence
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1R. A. Guzzo & M. W. Diekson, “ Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness,” Annual Review of Psychology ,Vol. 47(1996) ,pp. 307 - 338.
  • 2S. W. J. Kozlowski & K. J. A. Klein,“ Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes,” in K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski(eds. ),Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp. 3 - 90.
  • 3M. R. Barriek, G. L. Stewart & M. J. Neubert,et al,“Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83,No. 3(1998), pp. 377 - 391.
  • 4J. R. Hollenbeck, D. S. DeRue & R. Guzzo,“ Bridging the Gap between I/O Research and HR Practice: Improving Team Composition, Team Training and Team Task Design,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 43,No. 4(2004) ,pp. 353 - 366.
  • 5S. T. Bell,“ Deep-level Composition Variables as Predictors of Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology ,Vol. 92 ,No. 33(2007) ,pp. 595 - 615.
  • 6G. Hertel, U. Konradt & K. Voss,“ Competencies for Virtual Teamwork: Development and Validation of a Web-Based Selection Tool for Members of Distributed Teams,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology ,Vol. 15 ,No. 4(2006) ,pp. 477 - 504.
  • 7T. R. Halfhill, T. M. Nielsen & E. Sundstrom,“ The ASA Framework: A Field Study of Group Personality Composition and Group Performance in Military Action Teams ,” Small Group Research, Vol. 39, No. 5 (2008), pp. 616- 635.
  • 8L. Van Dyne, L. L. Cummings & J. McLean Parks,“ Extra-Role Behaviors; In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity,” in L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw(eds. ),Research in Organizational Behavior: Vol. 17, Greenwich: JAI Press, 1995,pp. 215 - 285.
  • 9J. M. George & K. Bettenhausen,“ Understanding Prosocial Behavior, Sales Performance, and Turnover: A Group-Level Analysis in a Service Context,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75 ,No. 6(1990) ,pp. 698 - 709.
  • 10D. W. Organ, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington: Lexington Books, 1988.

同被引文献408

引证文献21

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部