论经济分析在法律判断上的局限性——以康德法哲学为视角的批判

The Limits of Economic Analysis in Legal Judgements

由于在"法感"、事实认定以及正当性评价方面,往往存在非普遍的个性因素的影响,所以法律判断的不确定性难以避免。经济分析方法,一方面似乎可以满足人们对法律判断确定性的要求,但事实却并非如此;另一方面作为其法哲学基础的功利主义与当下中国社会的主流意识契合,但法律判断必须有别于当事人的权衡。法律受尊重比法律被遵守更重要,而能够获得人尊重的法律必须信奉尊重人。作为实践理性的法律,不应当仅仅关注当事人的经济利害,恰恰相反,它应当超越现象世界中的利益的羁绊。所以,或许放弃了权利本质乃是利益的观点,才能真正理解何谓康德哲学上的"人即目的",而经济分析在法律判断上的局限性的症结恰在于此。

The uncertainty of the law to judge hard to avoid. Economic analysis, on the one hand, people seem to meet the requirements of legal certainty to determine, but it is not the ease ; on the other hand, as part of its law based on utilitarian philosophy and the current sense of the Chinese fit the mainstream of society, but there must be other legal judgments trade - off in the party. Law than the law is respected is more important to comply with, and who can believe in respect for the law must respect. Rational as the practice of law, the parties should not be concerned about the economic interests, on the contrary, it should go beyond the phenomenon of interest in the world of the yoke. So, may be given up is the nature of the interests of the right perspective, can we really understand what is meant by Kant＇s philosophy of ＂people that the purpose＂, and economic analysis to determine the legal limitations on the crux of the problem exactly lies.