对《老学庵续笔记》真伪的质疑

True or False:A Question of A Supplement to Notes from Lao Xue An

《老学庵续笔记》未在绍定元年和《老学庵笔记》一起刊刻,《直斋书录解题》、《文献通考》、《宋史》中也未见著录,很可能是1345年以后由其他人伪托陆游所作。"续笔记"中的4则——"白打"、"退红"、"王元之诗"、"刘太简荐苏洵"都存在明显的错漏。"白打"是蹴鞠游戏中的一种,宋代非常流行,而"续笔记"的作者却不知晓;"退红"是染色的意思,且陆游本人也在诗歌创作中使用过"退红"这个词,而"续笔记"却误解为"粉红色";"续笔记"作者对王元之诗中"和莺吹折数枝花"一句之理解胶柱鼓瑟且极为浅陋;另外"续笔记"还将"雷太简"误为"刘太简",并对苏轼父子妄加批评。"续笔记"体现出来的学术水平较低,且与陆游本人的诗作和生平有矛盾之处,当系伪作。中华书局《唐宋史料笔记丛刊》中今人点校的《老学庵笔记》一书,未能对"续笔记"的真伪加以甄别,应属失误。

Because A Supplement to Notes from Lao Xue An didn＇t appear when Notes from Lao Xue An was published in the first year of Shaoding reign, also because its title was not included into An Explanatory Booklist from Zhi Zhai or General Verification to Literature or Song History, the book is likely to be a pseudograph, that is, written by someone passing off as Lu You after 1345. Four pieces of the book-＂ Bai Da＂, ＂Tui Hang＂ , ＂ Wang Yuan-zhi＇s Poems＂ and ＂A Brief Recommendation of Su Xun＂ -show evident mistakes and misses. As one kind of ＂Cuju＂ games, ＂Bai Da＂ is very popular in the Song Dynasty, but about which, the author of this book knows nothing. And ＂Tui Hong＂, related to tinct, is used by Lu You himself in his creation, which is mistaken for ＂pink＂ in the book. And the annotation of the Wang Yuan-zhi＇s verse ＂A breeze broke a few sticks of flower while orioles sang＂ is both stiff and shallow. What＇s more, the book also mistakes ＂Lei Tai-jian＂ for ＂Liu Taijian＂ and has a reckless criticism of Su Shi and his son. In a word, A Supplement to Notes from Lao Xue An not only displays a lower learning level but also contradicts Lu You＇s life and work, thus being nothing but a pseudograph. It is a misplay for Notes from Lao Xue An, one of the series titled ＂Historical Notes in the Tang and Song Dynasties＂ published by Chinese Press, not to distinguish between trueness and falseness.