期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

我国政府组织机构沿革的现实逻辑:从命令链到绩效链 被引量：6

Evolving of Chinese Government Institutions' Reform:from Command to Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 政府组织形式改革同样存在路径依赖的可能性,这就可能导致蹈入低效率路径并产生"锁定"效应。我国机构改革中路径依赖存在6个规律性命题:对权力的"大"变"小"、"聚"变"拆";从"大"到"小"与从"小"到"大"的"机构幻觉";从"议行合一"到"混沌行政国家";从命令链向绩效链转化的萌芽;"锁定"与"解锁"过程中的"既非锁定也非高效"态;"增量改革效率"到S效率的飞跃。为科学推进我国目前的政府组织形式——"大部制"改革,新一轮改革从一开始就应走在"理想线"上,或者至少尽量靠近"理想线"。 Reform of government institutions may has the path dependance, which will induce the low effiency. In the reform of government institution, there are 6 aspects which have the features of path dependance. The deep reform- ing idea is to turn big right to small one, from gather to disjoin; the evolution of oganization give us the illusion from big to small,and from small to big. The evolving logic turns from command to performance. Generally, the reform is in the status of unlocked and uneffcient in the process of locking and unlocking. In order to promote current form of government organization, which is Super-Ministry System, the new round refom should be up the ideal standard from the start,at least close to the ideal standard.
作者 尚虎平 尹艳红
机构地区 南京审计学院公共管理与绩效评估研究院 北京大学政府管理学院
出处 《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第9期133-139,共7页 Reform
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于数据挖掘的我国地方政府绩效评估指标设计研究"(批准号:70873100)
关键词 政府组织 机构改革 路径依赖 理想线 规律性命题 government institution, institution reform, path dependence, ideal standard, proposition in law
分类号 D630.1 [政治法律—中外政治制度] A81 [哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1M. Olson, "Mancur, Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government - Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations Are Rich and Others Poor," Journal of Economic Perspectives vol.10, No.2(Spring 1996), pp.3-24.
  • 2曼瑟·奥尔森.《权力与繁荣》，第30页，上海世纪出版集团，2005年版.
  • 3胡锦涛.《高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗-在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告》,《人民日报》,2007年10月25日.
  • 4《关于深化行政管理体制改革的意见》,新华网,2008年3月4日.
  • 5I. Bansal, J. Srivastava, "Creating socially Responsible Systems for Holistic Development", Social Responsibility Journal,Vol. 4, No.4(2008), pp.464 - 473.
  • 6P. Wilkins. "Accountability and Joined-up Government", Australian Journal of Public Administration, Volume 61, No. 1 (2002), pp.114-119.
  • 7Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量：256
  • 8T. Christensen, P. Lagraid, "Rebalancing the State Reregulation and the Reassertion of the centre", In T Christensen, P. Lagraid (Eds), Autonomy and Regulation Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Chehenham Edward Elgar(forthcoming), 2006.
  • 9Perri 6, et al., "Institutional Shaping of Interagency Working: Managing Tensions between Collaborative Working and Client Confidentiality", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol.17, No.3 (2007), pp. 405-434.
  • 10Perri 6, C. Raab, C. Bellamy, "Joined-Up Government and Privacy in The United Kingdom: Managing Tensions Between Data Protection and Social Policy (Part Ⅰ)". Public Administration, Vol.83, No. 1 (2005). pp.111-134.

二级参考文献60

  • 1Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12.
  • 2Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15.
  • 3Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
  • 4Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
  • 5Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93.
  • 6Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37.
  • 7Hood, C. (2005). The idea of Joined - Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.) , Joined - Up Government. British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Hood, C. and H. Rothstein (2001). Risk regulation under pressure. Problem Solving or Blame Shifting? Administration and Society, vol. 33 ( 1, March) : 21 -53.
  • 9Kavanagh, D. and D. Richards (2001). Departementalism and Joined -Up Government: Back to the Future? Parliamentary Affairs, 54:1 -18.
  • 10Kettl, D.F. (2003). Contingent Coordination: Practical and Theoretical Puzzles for Homeland Security. American Review for Public Administration, 33 (September) : 253 -277.

共引文献340

同被引文献71

二级引证文献42

改革
2009年 第9期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部