期刊文献+

基于变权的语言评价信息不完全的群组评价方法 被引量:5

Method of group evaluation based on variable weight with incomplete linguistic evaluation information
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对评价群体成员权重未知且语言评价信息不完全的群组评价问题,提出了一种基于变权的证据推理解决方法.该方法将各评价群体成员的评价意见作为证据,将位置权向量引入到信度初始分配的建立中,定义了冲突度指数的概念作为证据赋权的诱导分量,结合"大多数"模糊量化算子确定权重,并应用Dempster规则进行证据合成.该方法从证据之间提取权重信息,体现了采纳多数人意见的群组评价思想.最后给出了一个应用实例. An approaeh based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory and variable weight is proposed for the group evaluation problem with incomplete linguistic evaluation information and ignorance of group members' weight. Regarding all the group members' evaluation information as evidenee, the ranked positional weighting vector is introduced into the process of calculating basic probability assignment. The concept of conflict degree exponent is proposed as the inducing variable of the evidence re-ordering and the fuzzy linguistic quantifier "most of" is used to make the weights. The Dempster rule is used to synthesize evidence. Digging the weight information among the evidence, the proposed approach embodies the evaluation principle of adopting most people's opinion. Finally, an application example is given to illustrate the approach proposed.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期1351-1355,共5页 Control and Decision
基金 辽宁省财政科研基金项目(2007B002)
关键词 群组评价 语言评价信息 信息不完全 证据理论 位置权向量 Group evaluation Linguistic evaluation information Incomplete information Dempster-Shafer theory Ranked positional weighting vector
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. A model for linguistic partial information in decision making problem [J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 1994, 9(4): 365-378.
  • 2Herrera F, Herrera V E. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115 (1): 67-82.
  • 3Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6): 746-752.
  • 4王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5. 被引量:70
  • 5王坚强.一种信息不完全确定的多准则语言群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2007,22(4):394-398. 被引量:21
  • 6龚本刚,华中生,檀大水.一种语言评价信息不完全的多属性群决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(1):88-93. 被引量:29
  • 7Yang J B, Singh M G. An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics,1994, 24(1): 1-18.
  • 8杨春,李怀祖.一个证据推理模型及其在专家意见综合中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(4):43-48. 被引量:68
  • 9Yang J B, Xu D L. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 2002, 32(3):289-304.
  • 10Yang J B, Wang Y M, Xu D L, et al. The evidential reasoning approach for MCDA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2006, 171(1): 309-343.

二级参考文献69

  • 1王坚强.信息不完全的多准则层次分类方法研究[J].控制与决策,2004,19(11):1237-1240. 被引量:15
  • 2李炳军,刘思峰.一种基于区间数判断矩阵的群决策新方法[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):109-112. 被引量:21
  • 3王坚强.基于离差优化的信息不完全确定的多准则分类方法[J].控制与决策,2006,21(5):513-516. 被引量:10
  • 4陈Ting.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 5杨春 李怀祖.证据理论在证价与决策中的应用.二炮工程学院系统工程研究所研究报告[M].,1999..
  • 6樊治平.复杂多属性决策理论与方法的研究:博士学位论文[M].东北大学,1996..
  • 7Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On aggregation operations of linguistic label[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,1993, 8:351--370.
  • 8Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A : Systems and Humans, 1997, 27( 1 ) : 126-- 132.
  • 9Kacpizyk J. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 18:105--118.
  • 10Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision-making with linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences, 1995, 85:223--229.

共引文献355

同被引文献93

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部