明代节选本《韩非子》流传考述

A Historical Study of Selected Essays of Hanfeizi Published in the Ming Dynasty

明代所刻的《韩非子》节录选评本,现在已较难见到,所以前人对此大多不甚了了。陈启天的《增订韩非子校释》与陈奇猷的《韩非子新校注》虽然也辑录了《韩非子》各版本的序跋题识,但疏漏错误不少,他们对《韩非子》版本的论述也多有不当,如陈启天说孙鑛本"大抵以趙本》主,而以陳本參訂之";陈奇猷将"孙鑛本"与"孙月峰本"当作两种版本,说孙鑛本与孙月峰一"興趙本同,其出於趙本無疑"。至于张榜本,虽然过去的学都都有称述,但均不明了其初刻本与翻刻本的异同,对其诸多的翻刻本也大多不明了其间的关系,有人甚至将翻刻本视为珍本。为了澄清学术界的诸多迷误,本文详细考述了孙鑛本、张榜本等《韩非子》选本的来龙去脉,同时兼及庄天合本以及诸子百家选本,附录了其中具有重要学术价值的序文,以供研究者参考。

Different editions of Selected Essays of Hanfeizi are rare copies nowadays. Chen Qitian’s and Chen Qiyou’s editions have a collection of the prefaces and afterwords of other editions but they have quite a few mistakes plus some improper evaluation and conclusions. The paper gives a historical study of Sun Kuang’s and Zhang Bang’s editions of Selected Essays of Hanfeizi with other editions and some reliable prefaces as the references,which should be helpful to an objective study of different editions of Selected Essays of Hanfeizi.