期刊文献+

群体过程与互动分析系统 被引量:6

Small Group Process and Interaction Analysis System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 群体过程由各种行动和行为反应组成,具有动态性和复杂性。以往研究根据群体均衡理论、功能观点或时间理论等分别开发了各种基于研究者视角的群体互动过程观察分析系统。但很多研究结论并不一致,主要原因在于各个分析系统的关注点不同。本研究从信效度、理论基础、分析对象以及编码难易等角度总结了各个系统的优点和不足,并进一步提出未来研究可能的方向:构建适当的群体决策动态实验任务、明确群体过程作用机制、以及开发运用于实践的群体互动过程分析系统。 A dynamic and complex group process can be defined by members' actions and interactions. Much research focused on the interaction process and developed different observation analysis systems with frameworks of equilibrium, group function, or time theory. This study discussed the reliability, validity, theoretical orientation, analysis unit, and coding difficulty of these analysis systems, and suggested that a more sophisticated analysis system should take into account of the dynamic features of group task, the relationship between interaction process and group performance, and the utility of interaction coding systems.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期1067-1074,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70771101) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y205591)
关键词 小群体 群体过程 群体互动 分析系统 small group group process group interaction coding analysis system
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1林绚晖,卞冉,朱睿,车宏生.团队人格组成、团队过程对团队有效性的作用[J].心理学报,2008,40(4):437-447. 被引量:28
  • 2刘雪峰,张志学.模拟情境中工作团队成员互动过程的初步研究及其测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):253-259. 被引量:26
  • 3谢霍坚,陈国权,刘春红.(2003).团队组织模型-构建中国企业高效团队.上海:上海远东出版社.
  • 4Arrow, H., Poole, M. C., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35(1):73-105.
  • 5Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Barker, L. L., Wahlers, K. J., & Watson, K. W. (2001). Groups in Process-An introduction to small group communication (6th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • 7Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
  • 8Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems. New Brunswick, N J: Transaction Publishers.
  • 9Beck, D., & Fisch, R. (2000). Argumentation and emotional processes in group decision-making: Illustration of a multi-level interaction process analysis approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 183-201.
  • 10Burke, P. J. (2003). Interaction in Small Groups. In John DeLamater (Ed.). Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 363-388). New York: Kluwer-Plenum.

二级参考文献56

  • 1程乐华,时勘,左衍涛,孙健.人际关系适应特征的情境评价方法研究[J].应用心理学,1996,2(2):18-23. 被引量:4
  • 2Hackman J R The design of work teams. In: J W Lorsch ed.Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1987.
  • 3Ancona D G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33:334- 365.
  • 4Larson C E, LaFasto F. M. Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
  • 5Shepperd J A. Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113 : 67 - 81.
  • 6Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review,2001, 26:356 -376.
  • 7Siegel A 1, Federman, P J. A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decision. Moffett Field,CA.. NASA-Ames Research Center, 1973.
  • 8Helmreich R L. Cockpit management attitude. Human Factor,1984, 26:583 -589.
  • 9Helmreich R L, Foushee H C. Why crew resource management?Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in America. In: E L Wiener, B G Kanki, R L Helmreich ( Eds. ),Cockpit resource managemenL San Diego, CA: Academic Press,1993. 3-41.
  • 10Brannick M T, Roach R M, Salas E. Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 1993,6:287 - 308.

共引文献49

同被引文献81

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部