摘要
达尔文进化论的核心是自然选择理论,而达尔文最初理解的自然选择是个体选择,即生物个体是选择的单位。但如果生物个体是选择单位,那么生物界普遍存在的牺牲个人利益帮助他人的利他主义就不可能得到进化,因为,利他行为增加其他生物的适合度,减少了自己的适合度。这就是所谓的"达尔文难题"。达尔文晚年试图用群体选择理论的补充解决这个问题,但20世纪60年代之后,一些重要的生物学家怀疑群体选择的作用,提出了亲缘选择理论、基因选择理论和互惠利他主义。但这些理论都有自己的问题。所以,90年代之后,越来越多的生物学家重新阐释群体选择论,并采取多元主义的策略以解决达尔文的利他难题。
The core idea of Darwinian evolutionary theory is natural selection. The primary interpretation of natural lection is individual selection, i.e. individual is the unit of selection. But if individual is the unit of selection, the popular existence of altruism is hard to understand, because of the altruism increasing the fitness of the altruist others, not the fitness of himself. This is the so-called "Darwin's Altruism Puzzle". In the late year of Darwin's life, he try to resolving this puzzle by introducing group selection as a new selection force. Many important new Darwinian biologists in the late 1960s, however, suspected the role of group selection. They proposed kin selection, gene selection and reciprocal altruism as new theory for solving the puzzle. But each of them has difficulties for interpreting of it. From 1990s, more and more biologists have re-introduced and re-interpreted group selection, and have tried to hold a pluralist strategy in order to solve Darwin's Altruism Puzzle
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第9期1-7,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助"当代科技前沿的伦理问题及其价值抉择"(06JJD720003)
关键词
利他主义
群体选择
个体选择
基因选择
亲缘选择
互惠利他
altruism
group selection
individual selection
gene selection
kin selection
reciprocal altruism