摘要
社会科学方法论内在冲突(即理解方法论和实证方法论、方法论个人主义和方法论整体主义之间的冲突)产生的根源是片面的社会哲学,即"社会独特论"和"社会类似论"、社会唯名论和社会唯实论。韦伯、温奇、吉登斯为消弭这一冲突做了有益的尝试,但最终未能成功。社会科学方法论内在冲突消弭的有效途径就是以全面而完备的唯物史观为指导,在具体的社会实践基础上,将理解方法论和实证方法论、方法论个人主义和方法论整体主义融合起来。
The germ of the internal conflict of methodology of social science, which is the conflict between Methodology of understanding and Methodology of positiveness, between Methodological individualism and Methodological wholism, is the unilateral social philosophy, namely, "Theory of peculiarity" and "Theory of social similarity", Social Nominalism and Social Realism. Weber, Winch, Giddens made a useful attempt to put an end to the conflict, hut eventually failed. The effective avenue to the elimination of the internal conflict of methodology of social science is to take the viewpoint of social history of all-sided and self-contained Historical Materialism as a guidance and syncretize Methodology of understanding and both Methodology of positiveness, both Methodological individualism and both Methodological wholism basing on the concrete social practice.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第9期44-48,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
吉林省哲学社会科学基金项目"波普尔的社会科学方法论研究"(2008BZX03)
关键词
唯物史观
理解方法论
实证方法论
方法论个人主义
方法论整体主义
historical materialism
methodology of understanding
methodology of positiveness
methodological individualism
methodological wholism