期刊文献+

间接征收与中国海外投资利益保障——以厄瓜多尔征收99%石油特别收益金为视角 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 2008年8月,西班牙雷普索尔(Repsol)公司正式向ICSID提起向厄瓜多尔政府征收之诉,这是由厄瓜多尔政府宣布向外国石油公司就超出基准油价的额外收入征收99%的石油特别收益金而引发。我国投资者在本案中也具有重要利益。近年来,东道国不再常以直接征收方式剥夺外国投资者的财产权,而转用间接征收的方式以达到与直接征收类似的效果。我国投资者在走出去的过程中,应对间接征收问题有清晰和全面的认识,这对保护我国海外投资利益具有重要意义。
作者 梁咏
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2009年第5期143-147,共5页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
基金 美国福克斯国际学者项目部分资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Rainer Geiger. Regulatory Expropriation in International Law: Lesson from Multilateral Agreements on Investment [J]. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 2002( 11 ) : 100.
  • 2M. Sornarajah. The International Law on Foreign Investment [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 283.
  • 3ICSID Case ARB(AF)/00/2.
  • 4Tecmed v. Mexico Case, award, paras. 122, 133,147-149.
  • 5ICSID Case ARB/96/1.
  • 6ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/1, Award (August 30, 2000).
  • 7Maurizio Brunetti. NAFTA Chapter 11 : The Iran- United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation [J]. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2001(2): 205.
  • 8Charles N. Brower, Jason D. Brudechke. The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal [M]. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998: 669.
  • 9Award No. 141-7-2, reprinted in 6 Iran-US Claim Tribunal 219 (1984).
  • 10Tippets, Abbett, McCarthy, Stratton v. TAMS-AFFA Consulting Engineers of Iran, Award No. 141-7-2 (June 29, 1984).

二级参考文献22

  • 1[1]Michael G.Parisi,Moving Toward Transparency? An Examination of Regulatory Taking[J].Emory International Law Review,Vol.19 (2005),p.388.
  • 2[2]W.Michael Reisman & Robert D.Sloane,Indirect Expropriation and Its Valuation in the BIT Generation[J].The British Year Book of International Law,2003,p.116.
  • 3[3]Rainer Geiger,Regulatory Expropriations in International Law:Lessons from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment[J].New York University Environmental Law Journal,Vol.11(2002),p.107.
  • 4[4][14]Bjorn Kunoy,Developments in Indirect Expropriation Case Law in ICSID Transnational Arbitration[J].The Journal of World Investment & Trade,Vol.6(2005),p.472.
  • 5[6][23][26]L.Yves Fortier & Stephen L.Drymer,Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment:I Know It When I See It,or Caveat Investor[J].ICSID Review,Vol.19(2004),p.313 ;314 ;315.
  • 6[8][11]Rudolf Dolzer,Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property[J],ICSID Review,Vol.1 (1986),p.55 ;56.
  • 7[9][10][13][21] Rudolf Dolzer,Indirect Expropriation:New Development?[J].New York University Environmental Law Journal,Vol.11 (2002),p.79; 80 ;90 ;78-79.
  • 8[12]Richard Hecklinger,Opening Remark at "Making the Most of Investment Agreements" (coorganized by OECE,ICSID and UNCTAD[R].12 December 2005,Paris.
  • 9[15]Tecnicas Medioambienales TECMED S.A.v.The United Mexican States,Case No.ARB(AF)00//2,Award of May 29,2003,para.118.
  • 10[16]Ronald S.Lauder v.the Czech Republic,Award of September 3,2000,para.200.

共引文献24

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部