期刊文献+

中文词汇化组合概念理解子概念意义通达的实验研究

The Study of Component Concept Retrieving in the Understanding of Chinese Glossary Combined Concept
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文借助空间间隔和类别掩蔽两种方式分别考察了词汇化的组合概念理解过程中子概念意义通达情况。实验结果表明词汇化组合概念整体意义的理解需要借助两子概念意义的通达,修饰词和主名词在组合概念理解过程中发挥作用的大小和时间存在差异,实验结果在一定程度上支持关系竞争理论理论假设。 In this article we investigate the search course of the component concept meaning in the understanding of the glossary combined concept by means of space interval and class occultation separately. The result indicates that the whole meaning of the glossary combined concept is understood by way of component concept meaning retrieval; the effect and the time course of the modifier and the head noun of the combined concept in the procession of the whole meaning retrieval are different. The result supports the theoretical hypothesis of CARIN.
作者 张得龙 陈俊
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期1053-1056,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 组合概念 空间间隔 类别掩蔽 关系竞争理论 combined concept, space interval, class occultation, CARIN
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gage, C. L. The competition - among - relations in - nominalstheory of conceptual combination: implications forstimulus class formation and class expansion. Journal Of The Experimental Analysis Of Behavior, 2002, 78 (3) - 551 565.
  • 2Murphy, G. L. Noun phrase interPretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory And Language, 1990,29 (3): 259 - 288.
  • 3Gage, C. L. & Shoben, E. J. Influence of themalic relations on the comprehension of modifier - noun combinations. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, And Cognition, 1997, 23( 1 ) : 71 87.
  • 4Gertstorms&Edwardj. Wisniewski. Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? Memory & Cognition, 2005,33 (5) : 852 - 861.
  • 5刘烨,傅小兰.特征类型在组合概念范畴效应中的作用[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):450-457. 被引量:5
  • 6刘烨,傅小兰.概念组合的理论模型[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(1):17-26. 被引量:11
  • 7Gage, C. L., Spalding, T. L. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar nounnoun compounds. In Brain and Language, 2004,90:478 - 486.
  • 8Gage, C. L., Spalding, T. L, Gorrle, M. C. Sentential context and the interpretation of familiar open-compounds and novel modifier-noun phrases. In Language & Speech, 2005, 48: 203-221.
  • 9陈俊,张得龙.名-名组合概念关系竞争理论与研究的嬗变.

二级参考文献93

  • 1Solomon K O, Medin D L, Lynch E. Concepts do more than categorize. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999, 3 (3) : 99 - 105.
  • 2Wisniewski E J. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination.Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35(3) : 434 -453.
  • 3Wisniewski E J, Love B C. Relations versus Properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language,1998, 38(2) :177-202.
  • 4Bock J S, Clifton C. The role of salience in conceptual combination.Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28(8): 1378 - 1386.
  • 5Warrington E K, Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 1984, 107 : 829 - 854.
  • 6Farah M J, McClelland J L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, 120(4) : 339 -357.
  • 7McRae K, Cree G S. Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In Forde M E, Humphreys G W( Eds. ), Category specificity in brain and mind. New York: Psychology Press, 2002. 211 -249.
  • 8Santos L R, Caramazza A. The domain-specific hypothesis: A developmental and comparative perspective on category-specific deficits. In Forde M E, Humphreys G W. (Eds.), Category Specificity in Brain and Mind. New York: Psychology Press, 2002, 1 -23.
  • 9Sartori G, Job R, Zago S. A case of domain-specific semantic deficit. In Forde M E, Humphreys G W. (Eds.), Category Specificity in Brain and Mind. New York: Psychology Press, 2002. 25 -49.
  • 10Medin D L, Lynch E B, Solomon K O. Are there kinds of concepts?Annual Review of Psychology, 2000, 51 : 121 - 147.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部