期刊文献+

数学困难儿童的预期水平:基于PASS理论的研究

MLD Children's Anticipation Levels:A Study Based on the Theory of PASS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 预期是PASS理论中计划系统的重要组成部分。使用自行设计的预期问题单和经验丰富的数学教师提供的针对不同年级小学生的计算题,从难度预期、方法策略预期和效能预期三个方面对数学困难儿童的预期能力进行测评,并与学业正常儿童进行对比。结果发现,预期水平的学业成绩组间存在显著差异,(1)单困组在各预期任务上的得分均显著低于对照组;(2)双困组与对照组除在难度预期上差异不显著外,在其余预期任务上的得分均差异非常显著;(3)单困组与双困组在各预期任务上的差异均不显著。 According to the theory of PASS, anticipation is an important part of planning. Using the self-composed problem anticipation list to investigate the four dimensions of children's anticipation levels, i.e. difficulty, methods and their abilities before setting out to solve the listed arithmetic problems, the authors found that there were significant differences in the levels of all anticipation dimensions among groups of different math achievements.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期1099-1102,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:30470581) 华东师范大学优秀博士生培养基金的资助
关键词 预期 PASS理论 计划 单纯型数学困难 混合型数学困难 anticipation, PASS theory, planning, pure mathematics learning disability (MLD only), mathematics-reading disability (M-RD)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Das J P, Naglieri J A, Kirby J R, 1994. Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
  • 2Das J P, Naglieri J A, Kirby J R. 杨艳云等译.认知过程的评估智力的PASS理论.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999.
  • 3Parrila R K, Das J P, Dash U N. Development of planning and its relation to other cognitive processes. Journal of Applied Devetopnental Psychology, 1996, 17: 575- 602.
  • 4Das J P, Kar B C, Parrila R K. Cognitive Planning. Sage Publications, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London, 1995: 73 - 74.
  • 5Naglieri J A, Das J P. Cognitive Assessment System interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside, 1997.
  • 6李晓东,张向葵,沃建中.小学三年级数学学优生与学困生解决比较问题的差异[J].心理学报,2002,34(4):400-406. 被引量:32

二级参考文献8

  • 1刘儒德.在CAI下即时提示解题过程对小学三年级学生建构两步应用题整体结构的影响[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(2):19-24. 被引量:3
  • 2张庆林,管鹏.小学生表征应用题的元认知分析[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(3):13-16. 被引量:36
  • 3Lewis A B, Mayer R E. Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987, 79(4): 363~371
  • 4Hegarty M, Mayer R E, Monk C A. Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 87(1): 18~32
  • 5Davidson J E, Sternberg R J. Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In: Hacker D J, Dunlosky J, Graesser A C eds. Metacognition in education theory and Practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998. 47~68
  • 6Schoenfeld A H. What's all the fuss about metacognition? In: Schoenfeld A H. ed. Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987. 189~215
  • 7Schraw G S, Dunkle M E, Bendixen L D et al. Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 87(3): 433~444
  • 8Swanson H L. Influence of Metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational psychology, 1990, 82(2): 306~314

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部