期刊文献+

中日贸易壁垒博弈均衡的实证分析——基于GH贸易谈判模型

下载PDF
导出
摘要 贸易政策并非简单地由一国单边决定,往往是国家之间合作谈判、互动决策的均衡结果。以GH(95)贸易谈判模型为基础,利用1992—2001年关税数据和2001年非关税壁垒数据,研究中日贸易壁垒双边决策的影响因素,估计中日政府的社会福利权重,结论是:中日双边关税和多数非关税壁垒的实施体现为谈判均衡;中日政治经济力量对双边均衡保护程度的影响作用与模型预测不一致;社会福利权重的估计值都比较大;两国为平衡双边利益集团利益和社会福利而采用具有不同社会福利权重的不同保护措施。
作者 罗琳
出处 《工业技术经济》 2009年第9期87-92,共6页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"国际贸易摩擦的政治经济学分析与对策研究"(项目编号:07BGJ008)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Alessandro Nicita and Marcelo Olarreaga.Trade, Production and Protection 1976 - 2004[ DB]. http://www, worldbank. org \ trade,2006/访问时间2008 - 04 - 15.
  • 2Dani rodrik. Political economy of trade policy[ M]. Hand- book of International Economics, G.M.Grossman&K. Rogoff (ed.), 1995, (28) : 1457 -1494.
  • 3Gawande, K. and U. Bandyopadhyay. Is Protection for Sale? A Test of the Grossman - Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection[ J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2000,82( 1 ) : 139 ~ 52.
  • 4Goldberg, P. and G. Maggi. Protection for Sale : An Empirical Investigation [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1999,89 ( 5 ) : 1135 -55.
  • 5Grossman Gene M.and Helpman Elhanan.Trade Wars and TradeTalks[ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1995,103 (4) : 675 -707.
  • 6Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. Protection for Sale[J]. American Eeonomle Review, 1994,84(4) : 833-850.
  • 7Kishore Gawande, Hui Li.Trade Barriers as Bargaining Outcomes [ J]. The World Economy, 2006,29(4 ) : 437 -457.
  • 8Susumu Imai, Hajime Katayama and Kala Krislma.A Quantile - Based Test of Protection for Sale Modd[ DB]. NBER working papers w 13900,2008/访问时间 2008 - 03 - 28.
  • 9鲍晓华,朱钟棣.贸易政治经济学在中国的适用性检验:以技术性贸易壁垒为例[J].管理世界,2006,22(1):41-47. 被引量:11
  • 10盛斌.国际贸易政策的政治经济学:理论与经验方法[J].国际政治研究,2006,27(2):73-94. 被引量:19

二级参考文献93

  • 1鲍晓华.技术性贸易壁垒的双重性质及甄别机制[J].财贸经济,2005,26(10):68-72. 被引量:9
  • 2Abbott, Frederick L, 1997, "The Intersection of Law and Trade in the WTO System: Economics and the Transition to a Hard Law System", Ch.3 in Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade, Eds. David Orden and Donna Roberts, St.Paul, Minnesota.
  • 3Anderson, Kym, 1992, "A Standard Welfare Analysis of Policies Affecting Trade and the Environment", Chapter 2 in The Greening of World Trade Issues, Kym Anderson and Richard Blackhurst (eds.), Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
  • 4Bhagwati, Jagdish, 1996, The Demands to Reduce Domestic Diversity among Trading Nations, Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? The MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
  • 5Brooks, Jonathan C, A. Colin Cameron and Colin A.Carter, 1998, "Political Action Committee Contributions and U.S.Congressional Voting on Sugar Legislation", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(3):pp.441-454.
  • 6Gawande, Kishore, 1995, "Are U.S. Nontariff Barriers Retaliatory? An Application of Extreme Bounds Analysis in the TOBIT Model", The Review of Economies and Statistics, 77(4):pp.677-688.
  • 7Honma, Masayoshi and Yujiro Hayami,1986, "Structure of Agricultural Protection in Industrial Countries", Journal of International Economics, 20:pp.115-129.
  • 8Olarreaga, M. and I. Soloaga,1997, Endogenous Tariff Formation: The Case of MERCOSUR, Staff Working Paper, READ-97-003,Geneva: WTO.
  • 9Olson, Mancur,1985,"Space, Agriculture and Organization", American Journal of Agricultural Economics,67:pp.928-937.
  • 10Pehzman, Sam,1976,"Toward a More General Theory of Regulation", Journal of International Economics, 19:pp.211-240.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部