期刊文献+

改良式Forsus矫治器两种前伸下颌方式的疗效比较 被引量:3

Comparision of the effects between two modes of mandibular advancement by modified Forsus appliance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较改良式Forsus矫治器两种前伸下颌方式矫治安氏Ⅱ类下颌后缩病例所引起的髁突生长和下颌位置的变化。方法:应用改良式Forsus矫治器对19例安氏Ⅱ类男性患者采用逐步前伸下颌和跳跃性前伸下颌两种前伸下颌的方式进行功能性矫治,并在治疗前后拍摄头颅侧位片,采用SPSS12.0统计软件对测量结果进行配对t检验。结果:逐步前伸组比跳跃性前伸组获得了更多的髁状突矢状向生长量(1.3±1.2)mm和下颌骨前移量(1.4±1.8)mm,具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。逐步前伸组患者的下颌平面角明显减小(-0.08°±1.1°),P<0.05。前下面高度的增加在两组间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:前伸下颌的方式可影响髁突的生长量和生长方向,从而引起不同程度的下颌骨向前生长。 Objective:The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two modes of mandibular advancement in Class II malocclusion with modified Forsus appliance on condylar growth and position of the mandible.Method:19 children with Class II malocclusion were selected and treated by modified Forsus appliance with two modes of mandibular advancement:step-by-step mandibular advancement and maximum jumping of mandible.Cephalometric radiographs were taken and analyzed at pre-treatment and post-treatment.Paired t -test was used to determine if there were significant differences between the effects of two groups. Result: The sagittal growth of condylar and mandibular prognathism were significantly larger in the step-by-step advancing group than in the maximum jumping group ((1.3±1.2)mm, (1.4±1.8)mm), and the changes between the two groups were significant (P 〈0.05).The decrease of mandibular plane angle was significant in step- by-step group((-0.08±1.1)°,P 〈0.05). The increase of the lower facial height between the two groups were significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion:The modes of jumping affect the amount and pattern of condylar growth,and the position of the mandibular.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2009年第9期537-540,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 改良Forsus矫治器 Ⅱ类错 髁状突生长 前伸下颌 modified Forsus appliance Class II malocclusion condylar growth mandibular advancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age[J]. Angle Orthod, 1981,51 (3) : 177-202.
  • 2寇波,王春玲,刘东旭,魏福兰.自制式Forsus矫治器的制作及临床应用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):570-571. 被引量:1
  • 3Pancherz H, Hagg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation[J]. Am J Orthod, 1985,88 (4) : 273-287.
  • 4Illing HM,Morris DO,Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, bionator and twin block appliances. Part I-the hard tissues [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1998,20 (5) : 501-516.
  • 5John P, DeVincenzo, Michael W, et al. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects resulting from the use of a functional appliance with different amounts of protrusive activation [J]. Am J Orthod, 1989,96 (3) 181- 190.
  • 6Urban Hagg, A Bakr M Rabie, Margareta Bendeus, et al. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2008, 134 (4) : 525- 536.
  • 7Rabie AB, Tsai M J, Hagg U, et al. The correlation of replicating cells and osteogenesis in the condyle during stepwise advancement [J]. Angle Orthod, 2003,73 (4) : 457-465.
  • 8Flack F, Frankel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1989,96 (4): 333-341.
  • 9Bjark A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty [J]. Am J Orthod, 1972,62 (4): 339-383.
  • 10Chayanupatkul A, Rabie AB, Hagg U.Temporomandibular response to early and late removal of bite-jumping devices [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2003,25 (5) : 465-470.

二级参考文献5

  • 1McNamara JA Jr.Components of Class H malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age.Angle Orthod.1981,51(3):177
  • 2Heinig N,Goz G,Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring.J Orofae Orthop,2001,62(6):436
  • 3Ruf S,Pancherz H,The mechanism of Class H correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship:A cephalometric roentgenographic study,Angle Orthod,1997,67(4):271
  • 4Nalbantgil D,Arun T,Sayinsu K,et al.Skeletal,dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence,Angle Orthod,2005,75(3):382
  • 5常书楼,白丁,赵美英.上颌平面导板及斜面导板矫治器在固定矫治器的临床应用[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1998,16(1):93-94. 被引量:11

同被引文献38

  • 1张雨温,陈中,杨璞,周力,赵美英.Pancherz法评价两种功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类的骨牙效应[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(4):374-376. 被引量:4
  • 2Thickett EM, Hirani S, Williams A, et al. A prospective evaluation assessing the effectiveness of the "Dynamax" mandibular appliance in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea. Surgeon, 2009,7 ( 1 ) : 14-17.
  • 3Bass NM. The Dynamax system: a new orthopaedic appliance and ease report. J Orthod, 2006,33(2) :78-89.
  • 4Covell DA Jr, Tranunell DW, Boero RP, et al. A cephalometric study of Class Ⅱ Division I malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod, 1999,69 ( 4 ) : 311-320.
  • 5Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, et al. Initial effects of treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion with the Herren activator, activatorheadgear combination and Jasper Jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997,112( 1 ) :19-27.
  • 6Ramos DS, de Lima EM. A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal Class Ⅱ individuals. Angle Orthod, 2005,75( 1 ) :47-53.
  • 7Cozza P, Baecetti T, Franchi L, et al. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances, in Class ]] malocclusion: A systematic review [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(5):599.
  • 8Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, et al. Condyle- fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment. Part 2. Results and conclusions[J]. Am J Or- thod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(3):243.
  • 9Rabie AB, Xiong H, Higg U. Forward mandibular posi- tioning enhances condylar adaptation in aduh rats [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2004, 26(4):353-358.
  • 10Leung FY, Rabie AB, Hagg U. Neovaseularization and bone formation in the condyle during stepwise mandibu- lar advancement[J]. Ear J Orthod, 2004, 26(2): 137-141.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部