期刊文献+

老年患者麻醉趋势指数和脑状态指数与靶控输注丙泊酚预测效应室浓度的相关性 被引量:8

-Correlation between the Narcotrend index, the cerebral state index and the predicted effect site concentration during different state of consciousness in elderly patients with target controlled infusion of propofol
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨在无手术刺激状态下老年患者靶控输注丙泊酚时麻醉趋势指数(NCT)、脑状态指数(CSI)与不同镇静程度时预测效应部位浓度的相关性。方法选择ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,年龄65~75岁,行择期普外科手术患者20例。诱导插管前以丙泊酚靶控输注镇静,丙泊酚预测效应部位靶浓度从0.5mg/L开始递增,递增梯度为0.5mg/L,每一靶浓度输注5min,直至改良清醒镇静评分(OAA/S)为0后5min停止,连续监测患者Narcotrend指数和脑状态指数变化。每间隔20s行改良OAA/S评分,记录靶控输注系统预测效应部位浓度值每变化0.1mg/L时的预测效应部位浓度数值及时间及患者在丧失语言反应及意识消失时的预测效应部位浓度、NCT和CSI值。结果丙泊酚预测效应部位浓度值与NCT和CSI均呈较好的线性关系(砰分别为0.867与0.893,P〈0.01)。患者出现语言反应消失时的异丙酚预测效应部位浓度为(1.56±0.13)mg/L,NCT值为74.00±4.69,CSI值为69.82±5.47。患者出现意识消失时的预测效应部位浓度值(2.15±0.27)mg/L,NCT为63.30±7.50,CSI值为58.78±6.90。预测效应部位浓度值、NCT值、CSI值与OAA/S评分相关性良好,相关系数分别为-0.968、0.938、0.940(P〈0.01),OAA/S评分与Ce负相关,与NCT和CSI正相关。不同意识状态下NCT和CSI值相比,NCT值偏高(P〈0.01)。结论老年患者靶控输注丙泊酚后出现语言反应消失及意识消失时预测效应部位浓度值波动在一定的范围;NCT、CSI和丙泊酚预测效应部位浓度呈线性相关;NCT和CSI的监测均能反映老年患者丙泊酚的镇静程度;NCT与CSI指数显著相关,但在一定范同内要注意其存在偏差。 Objective To study the correlation between the Narcotrend index, cerebral state index and predicted effect site concentration during different state of consciousness in the absence of surgery in elderly patients with target controlled infusion of propofol. Methods Twenty patients aged from 65-75 years categorized as ASA class Ⅰ - Ⅱ who were scheduled to undergo general surgery under general anesthesia with target controlled infusion of propofol were recruited. During the target controlled infusion of propofol, the propofol infusion was set at an initial effect site concentration of 0.5 mg/L and increased by 0.5 mg/L every 5 rain until the modified observer's assessment of alertness / sedation scale (OAA/S) values of zero. The predicted effect site concentration of propofol, the values of CSI and NCT were recorded and the sedation level was examined by the modified OAA/S every 20 s. The predicted effect site concentrations of propofol in target controlled infusion (TCI) system were recorded when they increased by more than 0. 1 mg/L. The predicted effect site concentrations of propofol and the values of NCT and CSI at LVC and LOC of the patients were recorded. Results There was a good linear correlation between NCT and the predicted effect site concentration of propofol (R2 = 0. 867, P 〈 0.01 ) , as well as that between CSI and the predicted effect site concentration of propofol ( R2 = 0. 893, P 〈 0.01 ) . The predicted effect site concentrations of propofol at LVC was ( 1.56 ± 0.13 )mg/L while the values of NCT was 74.00 ± 4.69 and CSI 69.82 ± 5.47. The predicted effect site concentrations of propofol at LOC was (2.15 ± 0.27 ) mg/L while the values of NCT and CSI were 63.30 ±7.50 and 58.78 ± 6.90 respectively. All of the values of NCT, CSI and the predicted effect site concentrations had a good linear correlation with OAA/S. There was a negative correlation between OAA/S and the predicted effect site concentration. At the same time, there was a positive correlation between OAA/S and NCT as well as that between OAA/S and CSI. And the correlation coefficients were - 0. 968, 0. 938, 0. 940 respectively (P 〈 0.01 ). The values of NCT were higher significantly than that of CSI in different degree of LOC ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion During elder people's target controlled infusion of propofol, LVC and LOC occur within a definite range of predicted effect site concentrations. There is a good linear correlation between NCT, CSI and the predicted effect site concentrations of propofol. For the elders, both NCT and CSI reflect the sedation level of propofol. Although there is a significant correlation between NCT and CSI, a deviation does exist in a certain range. Therefore a simple 1:1 transfer from NCT to CSI is inadequate.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第33期2315-2318,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 清醒镇静 双异丙酚 静脉麻醉 麻醉深度 Conscious sedation Propofol Anesthesia, intravenous Anesthetic depth
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990, 10:244- 251.
  • 2Katch T, Suzuki A, Ikeda K. Electroencephalographie derivatives as a tool for predicting the depth of the sedation and anesthesia induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology, 1998, 88: 642.
  • 3Bruhn J , Bouillon TW , Radulescu L , et al. Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 ( SEP95 ) with clinical signs of " anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98:621-627.
  • 4Sehmidt GN , Bisehoff P , Standl T, et al. Comparative evaluation of the datex-ohmeda S/5 entropy module and the bispectral index monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2004, 101: 1283-1290.
  • 5Struys MM , Vereecke H , Moerman A , et al. Ability of the bispectral index, autoregressive modeling with exogenous input derived auditory evoked potentials, and predicted propofol concentrations to measure patient responsiveness during anesthesia with propofal and remifentanil. Anesthesiology, 2003, 99: 802- 812.
  • 6Nicola dismaI, Daniel Alauretta, Filippo Palermo, et al. Level of sedation evaluation with Cerebral State Index and A-Line Arx in children undergoing diagnostic procedures . Pediatric Anesth, 2007, 17:445-451.
  • 7Schneider G, Kochs EF, Horn B, et al. Narcotrend does not adequately detect the transition between awareness and unconsciousness in surgical patients. Anesthesiology, 2004, 101 : 1105-1111.
  • 8Kreuer S. The Narcotrend monitor. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology ,2006,20 : 111-119.
  • 9Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Walter E, et al. Comparative pharmacodynamic modeling using bispectral and Narcotrend-index with and without a pharmacodynamic plateau during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia,2008,106 : 1171-1181.
  • 10Schultz A, Siedenberg M, Grouven U, et al. Comparison of Narcotrend Index, Bispectral Index, spectral and entropy parameters during induction of propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput, 2008,22 : 103-111.

同被引文献52

  • 1薛庆生,陈蓓蕾,武晓文,于布为.熵指数和Narcotrend用于靶控输注异丙酚麻醉深度的比较[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(1):25-28. 被引量:29
  • 2张熙哲,吴新民.异丙酚靶控输注时瑞芬太尼抑制气管插管反应的半数有效血浆浓度[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(3):204-206. 被引量:46
  • 3李春雨,张飞娥,贾晋太.Narcotrend脑电监测在麻醉深度监测中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(7):593-594. 被引量:20
  • 4Yamashita S, Kaneda K, Han TH. Population pharmacokinetics of a propofol bolus administered in patients with major burns. Burns, 2010,36(8) :1215-1221.
  • 5Lopez Navarro AM, Peir6 C, Matoses S, et al. General anesthe- sia by infusion of remifentanil for debridement and grafting of large burns in 3 pediatric patients. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2004,51 ( 1 ) :47-50.
  • 6Han TH, Lee JH, Kwak IS, et al. The relatlonship between bis- pectral index and targeted propofol concentration is biphasic in patients with major burns. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005,49 (1) :85-91.
  • 7Munte S, Klockars J, van Gils M, et al. The Narcotrend index indicates age-related changes during propofol induction in chil- dren. Anesth Analg, 2009,109 ( 1 ) :53-59.
  • 8Schultz A, Siedenberg M, Grouven U, et al. Comparison of Nar- cotrend Index, Bispectral Index, spectral and entropy parameters during induction of propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput, 2008,22 ( 2 ) : 103-111.
  • 9Rundshagen I, Hardt T, Cortina K, et al. Narcotrend-assisted propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia vs clinical practice: does it make a difference?. Br J Anaesth, 2007,99 (5) :686-693.
  • 10Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology, 1996,84 ( 1 ) : 38- 51.

引证文献8

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部