摘要
《上博楚竹书(四).内礼》之篇题文献无征,且与传世文献存在不相契合之处,其义难解。从文字学角度来看,极有可能作"大礼"。"大礼"用作篇题,正合篇章内容。"大礼"用作篇题也有例可考。故《上博楚竹书(四).内礼》之篇题当非"内礼",而应作"大礼"。
There is an article that named "Neili" in Shangbo Chuzhushu (four) . It is nothing about "Neili" in Chinese ancient books and records, and the word "Neili" is paradoxical to Chinese ancient books and records. No one knows the meaning of "Neili". It should be "Dali" probably from the point of etymology. The title of "Dali" just matches the article' s contents. In Chinese ancient books and records, there was an article named "Dali" . Therefore, the title of the article in Shangbo Chuzhushu (four) should be "Dali" .
出处
《华夏考古》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期103-107,共5页
Huaxia Archaeology