退出者的声音——从广东凤铝诉中国篮协案反思我国职业体育临时救济

The Voice of Departees——Reflection on Guangdong Fenglu Ltd. v. C.B.A.

本文介绍了广东凤铝诉中国篮协案的基本案情和争议焦点。从立法学、宪法学、程序法和合同法等角度分析了其中的法律问题,援引国内外多个案例探讨本案可能的救济途径。研究认为救济措施的缺位是导致我国体育俱乐部不断退出职业联赛的制度性原因。建议我国在知识产权领域已引入"诉前禁令"的基础上,进一步推广经验,在体育案件中适用禁令,为当事人提供临时救济。

This paper introduces the basic facts and controversy of the case Guangdong Fenglu v. Chinese Basketball Association. From the angle of legislative study, Constitution theory, procedural law and contract law analysis of some legal issues about this case, citing the case at home and abroad to explore more Remedies. The research concluded that the absence of relief measures is the institutional reasons for why Chinese Sports Club constantly exit the League. Based the preliminary injunction applied in the field of intellectual property, We Recommended that China can go further, such as sat and applied interlocutory injunction in the field of sports case, so that the parties will get temporary relief.