期刊文献+

信息技术应用与企业决策权的配置:情境因素的作用 被引量:1

Information Technology and the Allocation of Firms' Decision-making Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有关于信息技术应用与企业决策权配置的研究存在着"集权化之争"。文章基于权变主义的思想构建了一个在不同情境因素作用下信息技术影响企业决策权配置的分析框架,从而将研究重点由结果导向(导致集权化还是分权化)转变为过程导向(在什么情况下导致集权化配置,又在什么情况下导致分权化配置),实现了集权化观点与分权化观点的的融合。 The present studies on the relationship between the application of information technology (IT) and the allocation of firms' decision-making fights have been largely directed toward the "centralization debate". This paper sets up a new analytical framework by incorporating contextual factors, based on the contingent approach. Accordingly, the focus of research has been shifted from a result orientation to a process orientation, and the perspectives of centralization and decentralization have been integrated.
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第9期23-29,共7页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划一般项目 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(8451042001001887) 广东外语外贸大学青年基金项目(GWQ0707)
关键词 信息技术 决策权 情境因素 information technology decision-making rights context factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献69

  • 1罗珉.大型企业的模块化:内容、意义与方法[J].中国工业经济,2005(3):68-75. 被引量:96
  • 2林丹明,叶会,解维敏,曾楚宏.信息技术应用对企业纵向边界的影响——实证研究与讨论[J].中国工业经济,2006(1):106-112. 被引量:24
  • 3Richard L.Daft 李维安译.组织理论与设计精要[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1999..
  • 4APEC. ,2003, '+char(34)+'APEC SME Infonnatization Survey'+char(34)+' ,APEC.
  • 5Black, S. and Lynch, L., 2001, "How to Compete : The Impact of Workplace Practices and information Technology on Productivity, '" Review of Economics and Statistics, August 2001,83(3) :434-445.
  • 6Barnett R. R. and Mackness ,J. R. , 1983," An Action Research Study of Small Firm", Management Journal of Applied Systems 10:63-83.
  • 7Bolton, P. and Dewatripont, M., 1994, "The Firm as a Communication Network," Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 : 809-839.
  • 8Bresnahan,T., Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. ,2002 ," Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor : Firm-level Evidence," Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 : 339-376.
  • 9Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L,, 1996, "Productivity, Profit and Consumer Welfare: Three Different Measures of Information Technology' s Value," MIS Quarterly,June 121-142.
  • 10Brynjolfsson,E. and Hitt, L., 1996, "Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending," Management Science 42/4 : 541 -558.

共引文献228

同被引文献15

  • 1Williamson, O. E. The institution of Capitalism New York: Free Press, 1985.
  • 2Klepper, S. Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle; American Economic Review, 1996, (3).
  • 3Volkoff, O., D. M. Strong, and Elmes, M. B. Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science, 2007, (5).
  • 4Leonardi, P. M. Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organization Science, 2007, (5).
  • 5J. Fulk and G. DeSanctis. Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 1995, (4).
  • 6Malone, T. W., J. Yates and R. I. Benjamin. Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 1987, (6).
  • 7V. Gurbaxani and S. Whang. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Com- munications of the ACM, 1991, (1).
  • 8Todd Dewett and G. R. Jones. The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management, 2001, (3).
  • 9Afuah, A. Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the Internet: Are firms really shrinking. Academy of Management Review, 2003, (1).
  • 10Brynjolfsson, E. and L. M. Hitt. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 1996, (4).

引证文献1

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部