期刊文献+

证据审查机制初探 被引量:5

A Tentative Study on the Mechanism of Evidence Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来学界对于证据规则的研究已经相当深入,对于证据审查的相关机制却疏于关注。证据审查包括证据筛选和证据评价两个相对独立的环节。英美法系国家证据审查的"分离模式"与大陆法系国家证据审查的"融合模式"各有优劣。我国证据审查模式选择的基本思路是将证据筛选和证据评价适度分离、对证据筛选活动进行诉讼化改造以及完善证据评价机制。 Compared with the study on evidence rules, the mechanism of evidence examination arouses less concern by scholars. Evidence examination can be divided into two stages of evidence screening and evidence evaluating. As for the mechanism of evidence examination, both the separation mode in the Common Law System and the integral mode in the Civil Law System have their own merits and defects. The ideal choice for our country is to adopt moderate separation mode of evidence screening and evidence evaluating, to introduce litigation mechanism for evidence screening and to perfect the mechanism of evidence evaluating.
作者 封利强
出处 《北方法学》 2009年第5期115-123,共9页 Northern Legal Science
关键词 证据审查 证据筛选 证据评价 分离模式 融合模式 evidence examination evidence screening evidence evaluating separation mode integral mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1.
  • 2Myrna S.Raeder.Cost-Benefit Analysis,Unintended Consequences,and Evidentiary Policy:A Critique and a Rethink-ing of the Application Of a Single Set of Evidence Rules to Civil and Criminal Cases[].CARDOZO LREV.1998
  • 3Linda Greenhouse.Judicial Intent:Competing Visions of the Role of the Court[].THE NEW YORK TIMES July.72002
  • 4John J.Capowski.The Appropriateness and Design of Categorical Decision-Making Systems[].ALBLREV.1984
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10See.FED.R EVID 101[]..

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部