期刊文献+

52周雷贝拉唑治疗对胃食管反流病患者生活质量的远期影响 被引量:7

Long-term impact on quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after 52-week rabeprazole treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解52周雷贝拉唑治疗结束2~3年后胃食管反流病(GERD)患者生活质量的变化。方法2007年11月至2008年2月,对多中心完成52周雷贝拉唑维持治疗2~3年后的GERD患者进行随访,其中糜烂性食管炎(EE)患者67例,非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERO)患者31例,采用GERD相关生活质量量表(GERD—HRQL)和SF-36健康量表评估患者生活质量。结果(1)与治疗前相比,EE患者GERD—HRQI。评分从12.5分降至3.5分(Z=-5.242,P=0.000);NERD患者从20.0分降至14.0分(Z=-4.130,P=0.000)。两组患者对生活总体满意度也均有显著上升(均P〈0.01)。(2)与完成52周治疗时相比,两组患者的GERD-HRQL评分无明显变化,分别为中位数2.0分比3.5分和5.0分比14.0分(均P〉0.05)。EE只在SF-36的精神健康维度评分低于前者[(53±17)分比(61±17)分,t=-2.143,P=0.035]。(3)随访时NERD组GERD—HRQL评分高于EE(中位数14.0分比3.5分,Z=-2.377,P=0.017),其余两组间差异无统计学意义。结论长期维持量雷贝拉唑治疗可以改善GERD患者的生活质量,且疗效可以长时间持续,NERD患者酸反流症状较EE重,但总体生活质量两亚型之间差异无统计学意义。 Objective To investigate the longitudinal changes in quality of life (QoL) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treated with 52-week rabeprazole over a period of 2-3 years. Methods A multi-center, open-label and randomized 52-week raberprazole trial was conducted in 67 eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) and 31 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. The fallow-up period is 2- 3 years after the treatment. Their QoL were evaluated using SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire and GERD-HRQL scale. The results were compared with those acquired before and after a 52-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Results (1) Both EE and NERD patients improved significantly according to GERD-HRQL scale in scores of reflux symptoms as well as overall satisfaction ( 12. 5 vs 3.5,20. 0 vs 14. 0, both P 〈 0. 01 ) versus the pre-therapy baseline. ( 2 ) Both EE and NERD patients had no significant difference in the scale of GERD-HRQL (2. 0 vs 3.5, 5.0 vs 4. 0, both P 〉0.05) and most major domains of SF-36 questionnaire versus the post-therapy baseline(53 ± 17 vs 61 ± 17 ,t = -2. 143 ,P =0. 035). (3) The NERD patients had a higher score of reflux symptoms than the EE patients according to the GERDHRQL Scale(14.0 vs 3.5, Z =2. 377, P =0. 017) , however there were no significant differences between NERD and EE in 8 major domains of SF-36 questionnaire (P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Long-term and low-dose PPI treatment achieves improvement both in reflux symptoms and QoL in GERD patients and such effects last a long time. At follow-ups, the reflux symptoms of NERD patients are more severe than EE patients. However, the overall QoL has shown little differences between these two subtypes.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第34期2404-2407,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃食管反流 生活质量 随访研究 雷贝拉唑 Gastroesophageal reflux Quality of life Follow-up studies Rabeprazole
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Moayyedi P, Axon AT. Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--the extent of the problem. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2005, 22 Suppl 1 : 11-19.
  • 2潘国宗,许国铭,郭慧平,柯美云,韩少梅,李兆申,方秀才,邹多武,鲁素彩,刘婧.北京上海胃食管反流症状的流行病学调查[J].中华消化杂志,1999,19(4):223-226. 被引量:676
  • 3E1-Serag HB. Epidemiology of non-erosive reflux disease. Digestion, 2008,78 Suppl 1:6-10.
  • 4Kulig M, Leodolter A, Vieth M, et al. Quality of life in relatien to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003, 18:767-776.
  • 5Armstrong D, Marshall, JK, Chiba N, et al. Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults--update 2004. Can J Gastroenterol, 2005, 19 : 15-35.
  • 6刘晓红,柯美云,宋志强,罗金燕,袁耀宗,侯晓华,朱有玲,孙菁,查慧.雷贝拉唑对胃食管反流病患者生活质量的影响[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(11):818-821. 被引量:26
  • 7Liu XH, Ke MY, Song ZQ, et al. A quality of life in patients with EE and NERD treated by rabeprazole--an one-yr's open study. Gastroenterology, 2006, 130(2 Suppl):S1216.
  • 8Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, et al. Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg, 1996, 183: 217-224.
  • 9Velanovich V. Comparison of generic ( SF-36 ) vs. disease specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of- life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg,1998, 2 : 141-145.
  • 10Savarino V, Di Mario F, Scarpignato C. Proton pump inhibitors in GORD An overview of their pharmacology, efficacy and safety. Pharmacol Res, 2009,59 : 135-153.

二级参考文献15

  • 1柯美云 潘国宗 等.胃食管反流病.现代胃肠病学(上册,第一版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.729-739.
  • 2钟旭,中华内科杂志,1998年,37卷,231页
  • 3Chang C S,Am J Gastroenterology,1997年,92卷,668页
  • 4柯美云,现代胃肠病学.上,1994年,729页
  • 5Velanovich V. Quality of life and severity of symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a clinical review. Eur J Surg, 2000, 166:516-525.
  • 6Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gasroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology, 1997, 112:1448-1456.
  • 7Wiklund I. Review of the quality of life and burden of illness in ganstroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis, 2004, 22:108-114.
  • 8Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care, 1998, 26:724-735.
  • 9Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology, 1996, 111: 85-92.
  • 10Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS,et al. Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003, 17: 537-545.

共引文献693

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部