摘要
目的:运用Meta分析的方法定量评价以问题为基础的学习(PBL)与以讲座为基础的学习(LBL)两种教学模式在临床见习课程中应用效果。方法:检索中国生物医学文献、中文学术期刊全文、PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane图书馆等数据库近10年发表的有关PBL与LBL教学法在临床见习课程中应用的文献,根据选择标准选取前瞻性的随机对照研究,从基础理论知识和临床实践能力两方面计算合并效应值及其95%a区间。结果:获取基础理论知识方面PBL与LBL合并效应值之间差异无统计学意义(d=1.665,95%CI为-0.016~3.346,P〉0.05);提高临床实践能力方面合并效应值PBL显著优于LBL(d=4.098,95%CI为1.695~6.501,P〈0.001)。结论:在临床见习课程中应用PBL教学法能够提高学习者临床实践能力。
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of problem--based learning(PBL) and lecture--based learning(LBL) applied in clinical clerkship by using Meta--analysis. Methods: Related studies in recent l0 years were searched through, CNKI, CBMdisc, PubMed, EBSCO and Cochrane library. The randomized control trials meeting the pre--defined criteria were chosen. Outcome measures included participants" basic knowledge and the performance of clinical practice. Results: There was no significant difference in the combined effect sizes of the basic knowledge between PBL and LBL( d = 1. 665, 95% CI 为-0. 016-3. 346, P〉0.05). However, there was significant difference in those of the performance of clinical practice between PBL and LBL( d =4. 098, 95% CI 为 1. 695-6. 501, P d0. 001). Conclusion: PBL in clinical clerkship can facilitate participants" performance of the clinical practice.
出处
《包头医学院学报》
CAS
2009年第4期90-92,共3页
Journal of Baotou Medical College