摘要
《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》内部未决问题主要通过公约第7条第2款解决。内部未决问题的界定应从公约背景及目的进行考察。内部未决问题解决的第一路径——一般原则方法应涵盖类推法。一般原则主要包括意思自治原则、合理原则等。内部未决问题解决的第二路径——国际私法路径是有条件的适用,易造成法律适用结果的不确定性。内部未决问题解决的第三路径--将UNIDROIT和PECL作为空白填补的新标准应谨慎。
Aticle 7 (2) of United Nations Convention on Contracts of International Sale of Goods is used to fill the gaps.The back- ground and goal of the Convention should be taken into consideration while identifying the gaps.The first approach of gap-filling which should cover analogical application is recoursing to general principles including party autonomy and reasonableness and so forth. Recoursing to international private law,as the second approach, is conditonal,and prone to incur uncertainty. The third appoach of viewing UNIDROIT and PECL as a new criterion should be applied discreetly.
出处
《漳州师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2009年第3期37-41,共5页
Journal of Zhangzhou Teachers College:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词
未决问题
一般原则
国际私法
gaps praeter legem, general principle,international private law