期刊文献+

斡旋受贿的新思考——写在刑法修正案(七)后

New Thinking on the Good Offices of Bribery——Written after the Criminal Code Amendment (7)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新的刑法修正案(七)对斡旋受贿的有关规定有了新的调整,扩大了这一罪的犯罪主体范围。而新的变化引起了对没有变化的原条文中"利用本人职权或者地位形成的便利条件"这一犯罪构成要件存在的反思。国家工作人员对其他国家工作人员存在着不可避免的制约关系,当利用其他国家工作人员的职权时,行为人的国家工作人员身份必然产生影响,刑法没必要将便利条件设为刑法要件。刑法第388条与一般受贿存相比有着自己的独立罪状,应该有自己的独立罪名,斡旋受贿。 The relevant provisions of the new Criminal Code Amendment (7) on the good offices of bribery have made a new adjustment, expanding the scope of criminal subject the crime. The new changes lead to new reflection no change of the original provision of “to use my authority or status to facilitate the formation of conditions” of the criminal existence elements of the crime. One national staff personnel have an unavoidable constraint relation with other country' s staff personnel. In the use of authority and power of other country' s national staff, the identity of the national staff of the perpetrator will inevitably have an influence and Penal Code do not need to set the conditions to facilitate the criminal element. Penal Code section 388, compared with general bribery, has its own independent counts and should have its own independent counts:bribery mediation.
作者 丁旭
机构地区 南京大学法学院
出处 《云南电大学报》 2009年第3期55-58,共4页 Journal of Yunnan Rty University
关键词 便利条件 制约 罪名 斡旋受贿 conditions constraints offense the good offices of bribery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献23

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部