期刊文献+

元好问、严羽唐诗持论考察 被引量:2

YUAN Hao wen,YAN Yu Tang Holding of Inspection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金与南宋对峙,其文艺思想、诗学批评差异很大。作为当时南北诗学代表人物的元好问与严羽可作为双方代表。元好问与严羽对唐诗持论同中有异,其相同处表现在两人都提倡唐诗的自然浑成、刚劲豪放和诗歌悟境;不同之处在于元好问论诗无门户之见,对唐诗的评价多侧重于思想内容,且态度较客观中允;严羽则门户之见森严,俨然以盛唐为法,对中、晚唐诗批评过甚。探究两人唐诗持论差异之成因,可见其主要受文化思潮、国情时势以及自身素养等多方面的影响。 Jin confrontation with the Southern Song Dynasty, and its literary and artistic thought, very different poetics criticism. Poetry as a representative of the North and the South at the time of the Yuan and Yan Yu can be used as representatives of both parties. Tang Yuan and Yan Yu for holding on in there is different with its performance at the same Department both advocated natural pistachio Tang Cheng, bold Comprehend Haofang and poetry; The difference is no prejudice Poetry Yuan, Tang evaluation of many focused on the content of thought, and in a more objective attitude Yun, Yah Yu prejudice are heavily guarded, as if to Tang for the law, the late Tang criticism too much. Tang holding on to explore both the causes of the difference can be seen by its cultural atmosphere, the relationship between teachers, their own national situation and the impact of various quality.
作者 刘福燕
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第5期121-124,共4页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科规划项目(07BZW035)
关键词 元好问 严羽 诗学 唐诗 YUAN Hao wen YAN Yu poetics Tang poetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1郭绍虞.沧浪诗话校释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1983..
  • 2李正民.元好问全集[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1990.
  • 3魏庆之.诗人玉屑[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978..
  • 4孙钦善.论语注释[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1990:235.
  • 5陈滞.礼记[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
  • 6陈鼓应.庄子今注今释[M].北京:中华书局,1983.

共引文献152

同被引文献75

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部