师范院校贫困生与非贫困生防御方式比较

Normal University poor students and non-poor students of the comparative study of Defense Style

本研究采用防御方式问卷(DSQ)中译本,对师范院校168名在校本科生进行问卷调查。分析结果显示:1.师范院校贫困生与非贫困生一样,都能较多地使用成熟的防御方式,表现出整体较高的成熟倾向,他们之间没有明显的差异;2.师范院校贫困生与非贫困生使用的防御方式在各年级间的差异并不显著;3.师范院校贫困生对三种防御方式的使用存在着非常显著的差异,成熟防御方式高于中间型防御方式,不成熟防御方式使用得最少。

In this study, Defense Style Questionnaire （DSQ） Chinese translation of 168 Normal university students conducted a questionnaire survey. Analysis of results showed that： 1. Normal University non-poor students as poor students, can use more mature defense style, showing the overall tendency of a higher maturity, they are not significant differences; 2. The difference of between the grades is not significant, which the defense Normal University poor and non-poor students use; 3. Normal University poor students to use three forms of defense there is a very significant difference in the middle of a mature defense style defense than the way an immature defense style use the least.