期刊文献+

沉默权性质再探

A Study of the Right to Silence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 沉默权涉及问题复杂,其形成有特定的历史根源与制度根基,牵一发而动全身。对英美沉默权规则界定不清会导致认识的不足。当前理论界对沉默权的理解存在一些误区。沉默权是针对讯问采取拒绝回答的方式而享有对抗讯问的特殊权利。在沉默权语境中,沉默的自由与沉默的权利不分,沉默权的立法概念、性质、意义特殊,权利的正当性亦显特殊。其不科学之处在于缺乏立法与实践的来源依据,因之沉默权制度不应设立。 The freedom of speech is a right granted by the constitution. So the right to silence must be conferred by law and the authority. In the common law, the right to silence has its specific significance, which witnesses the procedures of the sanctions regime, criminal justice system, detection capability of supporting adaptation. In the United States, there are many criticisms on the right. In the civil law, the requirement is no forced self - incrimination. Obviously, the right to silence system and our entire criminal justice system are not consistent with each other.
作者 谌东华
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《大连大学学报》 2009年第5期106-109,共4页 Journal of Dalian University
关键词 沉默 沉默权 沉默的权利 silence right to silence no forced self - incrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

共引文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部