期刊文献+

论习惯的合法性检验标准 被引量:16

The Criteria of Validity Test of Customs in the Judicial Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民间习惯的司法识别,实质上就是法官在习惯中发现案件的裁判规范并通过合法性检验将其正当化的过程。合法性检验的核心问题乃是标准问题,这是习惯在司法中出场的技术前提。通过比较可以发现,很多法治发达国家或者法治后进国家的司法,都存在习惯的合法性检验标准,而中国则缺少这样一个全国适用的体系。在规范分析的角度上,该标准体系可以在理论上、制度上加以重构,从各国实践中抽取出共同要素,就可以描述性地构建一个大体上具有可操作性的检验标准体系。中国司法不能总是消极地应对民间法治资源,在习惯进入司法已经提上日程的前提下,建立检验标准体系并通过案例使之逐步明晰是"必由之路"。 Judicial recognition of the custom is a process in which the judge identifies norms for decision in the custom and validates it by test. The key problem of the validity test of customs is the criteria applied, which is also the technical precondition for judicial application of the custom. By comparison, it is found that there exists a criteria system of validity test of customs both in developed and developing countries. However, in China a criteria system applicable to the whole nation is still missing. Such a system can be reconstructed theoretically and institutionally by absorbing the common factors of the judicial practices of various countries in the world. The Chinese judicature should not passively deal with the folk legal resources. With judicial application of the custom on top agenda, it is the only way for us to set up a system of the criteria of validity test of customs by the Supreme Court and clarify it case by case.
作者 王林敏
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期45-52,共8页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 习惯 司法识别 合法性 合法律性 custom judicial recognition legitimacy legality
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1严存生.法的合法性问题研究[J].法律科学,2002,20(3):3-14. 被引量:75
  • 2张星久.论合法性研究的依据、学术价值及其存在的问题[J].法学评论,2000,18(3):26-35. 被引量:26
  • 3王洪平,房绍坤.民事习惯的动态法典化——民事习惯之司法导入机制研究[J].法制与社会发展,2007,13(1):82-94. 被引量:43
  • 4W. JethroBrown. Customary Low in Modern England. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 8, (Dec. , 1905), pp. 570-575.
  • 5Derek Asiedu-Akrofi. Judicial Recognition and Adoption of Customary Law in Nigeria. The American Journal of Comparative law,Vol. 37, No. 3, (Summer, 1989), pp. 571-593.
  • 6Lindesay J. Robertson. The Judicial Recognition of Custom in India. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, ThirdSeries, Vol. 4, No. 4 (1922), pp. 218-228.
  • 7E. S. Haydon. The Choice of Chinese Customary Law in Hong Kong. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol, 11, No. 1, (Jan., 1962), p. 232.
  • 8D. J. lewis. A Requiem for Chinese Customary law in Hong Kong. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, (Apr., 1983), pp. 347-356.
  • 9黄源盛.《民初大理院民事审判法源问题再探》,载李贵连主编.《近代法研究》,北京:北京大学出版社,2007年,第8页.
  • 10Derek Asiedu-Akrofi. Judicial Recognition and Adoption of Customary Law in Nigeria. The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 37, No. 3, (Summer, 1989), p. 583.

二级参考文献51

共引文献142

同被引文献211

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部