三种方案治疗妇女宫颈糜烂的成本-效果分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for cervical erosion

目的:比较三种方案治疗妇女宫颈糜烂的临床疗效并进行药物经济学成本-效果分析。方法:172例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为A、B、C三组,分别采用不同的方法进行治疗,运用药物经济学的成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果:A、B、C组治疗宫颈糜烂的成本分别为337.40元、330.60元、260.00元,总有效率分别为61.54%、70.00%、96.67%,成本-效果比分别为548.26、472.29和268.96,A、B组相对C组患者的增量成本-效果比分别为-220.32和-264.72。结论:焦聚超声波治疗是治疗宫颈糜烂的最佳方案。

Objective： To compare the curative effects and pharmacoeconomic costs of three therapeutic schemes in treatment of cervical erosion. Methods： 300 cervical erosion patients were randomly divided into the groups of A, B and C, and treated with three different methods. A cost-effectiveness analysis in pharmacoeconomics was conducted. Results： The curative effects on cervical erosion patients in group A, B and C were 61.54%, 70.00% and 96.67% respectively. The Cost-effectiveness ratios were 548.26, 472.29 and 268.96 respectively, compared to group C, the added cost-effectiveness ratios of group A and B were -220.32 and -264.72 respectively. Conclusion： Among the three therapeutic schemes, Primedic sono is a best solution for treatment of cervical erosion.