期刊文献+

禾顶囊壳对小麦初生根和次生根的侵染性研究 被引量:1

Infectivity of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici on the Seminal and Secondary Roots of Wheat
下载PDF
导出
摘要 禾顶囊壳小麦变种是侵染小麦根部引起全蚀病害的致病菌,采用室内盆栽接种方法,研究了全蚀病菌——禾顶囊壳小麦变种对小麦初生根与次生根侵染性的差异。结果表明,小麦初生根易感全蚀病菌,是禾顶囊壳小麦变种的主要侵染部位,而次生根相对抗病,其发病轻重与次生根的生理年龄和小麦品种的抗病性有关,小麦8793-8较76120抗禾顶囊壳小麦变种的侵染。研究结果对认识禾顶囊壳小麦变种的致病机理以及利用抗病品种控制该病的危害具有重要意义。 The infectivity of the take-all causing pathogen Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) on the seminal and secondary roots of wheat was determined with pot assay in glass house. The results showed that the seminal roots of wheat were highly susceptible to the infection of Ggt. However, the secondary roots were relatively resistant, and the degree of severity was associated with the age of roots and the resistance of wheat cuhivars to the take-all disease. In comparison to 76120, 8793-8 was a cuhivar resistant to the infection of Ggt, which indicated that application of wheat disease-resistant varieties might be a successful way for controlling "take-all" disease.
出处 《中国农学通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第19期209-212,共4页 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基金 北京市丰台区科技型中小企业创新基金项目"克服重茬栽培障碍生物有机肥的开发与应用"(2007CXJJ20)
关键词 小麦 初生根 次生根 禾顶囊壳 全蚀病 wheat, seminal roots, secondary roots, Gaemannomyces graminis var. tritici, take-all disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Zengel Z, Graham RD, Pedler JF. Manganese nutrition and accumulation of phenolies and lignin as related to differential resistance of wheat genotypes to the take-all fungus[J]. Plant and Soil,1993,151: 255-263.
  • 2贾廷祥,吴桂本,刘传德.我国小麦根腐性病害研究现状及防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1995,28(3):41-48. 被引量:44
  • 3Solel Z, Benze IS, Dori S. Features of resistance to take-all in cereal species evaluated by laboratory assays[J]. J Phytopathol, 1990,130: 219-223.
  • 4刘常宏,王美楠,南鸿生.麦类作物抗全蚀病室内苗期接种方法与评价指标[J].植物保护学报,2001,28(3):223-228. 被引量:8
  • 5Penrose L. Influence of wheat of seed on hyphal growth of the take-all pathogen, C, aeumannomyces graminis vat. tritici, in wheat roots grown in sand culture[J]. Aust J Agric, 1987,27:559-561.
  • 6刘常宏,商鸿生.禾顶囊壳小麦变种对小麦种子根的侵染过程[J].植物病理学报,2000,30(1):19-24. 被引量:8
  • 7Scott PR. Variation in host susceptibility//Asher MJC, Shipton PJ. Biology and Control of Take-all[M]. London: Academic Press,1981: 219 -236.
  • 8Penrose LDJ. Interpretive value of symptoms of infection by Gaeumannomyces graminis vat. tritici in wheat seedlings grown in sand culture[J]. Ann Appl Biol, 1992,121:545-557.
  • 9Osbourn AE, Clarke BR, Lunness P, et al. An oat species lacking avenacin is susceptible to infection by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici[J]. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol,1994,45:457-467.

二级参考文献34

  • 1李良,瞿青茶,胡初生,徐小君,王植杏.小麦镰刀菌根腐病病原鉴定及其防治[J].植物保护,1989,15(6):16-19. 被引量:10
  • 2贾廷祥,吴桂本,刘传德.我国小麦根腐性病害研究现状及防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1995,28(3):41-48. 被引量:44
  • 3吴桂本,植物保护,1979年,4期,4页
  • 4韩绍英,农业土壤真菌,1979年
  • 5陆师义,植病知识,1957年,2卷,19页
  • 6贾廷祥,植物保护,1994年,1期,11页
  • 7贾廷祥,山东农业科学,1993年,5期,16页
  • 8王奎荣,江苏农业科学,1992年,2期,32页
  • 9王树权,西北农业大学学报,1991年,19卷,2期,32页
  • 10王剑雄,沈阳农业大学学报,1990年,21卷,专辑,26页

共引文献57

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部