期刊文献+

两种沙门菌显色培养基实际应用效果比对研究 被引量:4

Comparation of practical application effect of two Salmonella chromogenic media
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考核HKM沙门菌显色培养基的实际应用效果。方法:两两配对按照国标(GB/T4789.4-2008)进行检验。结果:沙门菌在HKM沙门菌显色培养基上较CHROM agar沙门菌显色培养基菌落大,色泽浓,数量相似;通过对162份生肉食品检测,HKM检出率39.51%,CHROM agar检出率33.95%,两者无显著性差异;鸡肛拭子样品48份,两者检出率相同,无差异;配对试验结果显示,相对于比较方培养基,HKM沙门菌显色培养基的假阴性率低于CHROM agar沙门菌显色培养基(2.38%和6.67%),但两者无显著性差异。结论:HKM沙门菌显色培养基可以应用于食品、环境和人畜粪便的沙门菌的监测、调查和出证检验。 Objective:To observe the effect of two Salmonella chromogenic media in practical application. Methods:Matching method was carried out in according to the National Standards ( GB/T4789.4 - 2008 ). Results: The colony size of Salmonella strain in HKM chromogenic medium was bigger than that in CHROMagar medium, and the color in HKM was dense, however, the colony quantity in both cultures was similar. According to the detection results of 162 raw meat samples, the Salmonella detection rate of HKM was 39.51%, the CHROMagar was 33.95%, there was no significant difference between two media. Furthermore, 48 chicken anal swabs were also employed to assess two selective cultures and showed the same detection rate. The matching experiment expressed that the false negative rate of HKM medium was lower than that of CHROMagar (2. 38% and 6. 67% ), but no significant difference was existed between two cultures. Conclusion:HKM Salmonella chromogenic medium can be used in Salmonella detection, investigation and inspection in food, environment, human and animal faeces.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2009年第9期2028-2029,共2页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基金 河南省医药卫生科技攻关重点项目(20060150)
关键词 沙门菌显色培养基 实际应用 比对 Salmonella chromogenic medium Practical application Comparation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1吴清平,周艳红,蔡芷荷.卫生微生物特异性显色培养基的研究与应用[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2005,15(1):124-126. 被引量:72
  • 2卢勉飞,吴清平,刘云林,蔡芷荷,符高敏.特异性酶反应在食源性致病菌检测中的应用[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2005,15(3):354-356. 被引量:23
  • 3朱光富.快速微生物检测试剂盒和快速检测仪[J].现代商检科技,1997,7(1):59-63. 被引量:5
  • 4Enne de Boer.Update on media for isolation of Enterobacteriaceae from foods[J].Int J Food Microbiol,1998,45:43-53.
  • 5Brenner KP, Rankin CC, Roybal YR,et al.New medium for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1993,56:3534-3544.
  • 6Berg JD, Fiksdal L.Rapid detection of total and fecal coliforms in water by enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-methylumbel- liferone-β-D-galactoside[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1988,54:2118-2122.
  • 7Hahn G, Wittrock E.Comparison of chromogenic and fluorogenic substances for differentiation of coliforms and E.coli in soft cheese[J].Acta Microbiol Hung,1991,38:265-271.
  • 8Readycult?qcoliforms 100 presence/absence test for detection and identification of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in finished water.November 2000 Version 1.0.Merck Darmstadt Germany.
  • 9Tryland I,Fiksdal L.Enzyme characteristics of-β-D-galactosidase-and -β-D-glucuronidase-positive bacteria and their interference in rapid methods for detection of waterborne coliforms and Escherichia coli[J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998,64:1018-1023.
  • 10Venkateswaran K, Murakoshi A, Satake M.Comparison of commercially available kits with standard methods for the detection of coliforms and E.coli in foods[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1996,62:2236-2243.

共引文献100

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部