期刊文献+

“转形问题”:一个百年难题的解读

Transformation-problem:The Interpretation of a Century Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "价值转形"问题的讨论多沿用鲍尔特凯维兹思维路径,构建"价值转形方程组",并检验其是否有解。但一直没有得到令人信服的结论,且仅仅是在说明"转形"的可能性,并不能为劳动价值论提供有力的证据。本文认为解决"价值转形"问题应考虑社会需求约束下的要素转移统计规律,并推断构建各部门生产价格和价值间的离差之和并证明其收敛于零,这是证明命题成立必然性的可行路径。 The discussion of transformation problem mainly continues along with the way of Bortkiewicz L. v., trying to construct the value transfer- equation-set, and examining whether it have its solution. But they had not obtained the persuasive conclusion. It is merely the discussion of transformation possibility, and cannot provide the strong evidence for the labor theory of value. This article think that to solution transformation-problem we should consider the social demand restraint and its statistics rule. We infer constructing the deviation of the price and the value, and proving its restraining to zero, may be a feasible way.
出处 《河南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第2期241-244,共4页 Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences
关键词 价值转形 可能性 必然性 Value Transformation Possibility Inevitability
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献7

  • 1丁堡骏.转形问题研究[J].中国社会科学,1999(5):21-34. 被引量:45
  • 2Diknson, H. D., 1956. "A Comment on Meek' s 'Note on the Transformation Problem'." The Economic Journal, Dec.
  • 3Okishio, Nobuo, 1974. " Value and Production Price. " Economic Review of Kobe University, 1974(20).
  • 4Morishima, Michio and Catephores, George, 1978. Value Exploitation and Growth. McGraw-Hill.
  • 5斯拉法.《用商品生产商品》:中文版[M].北京:商务印书馆,1963.24-25页.
  • 6程恩富.《现代政治经济学》[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1999..
  • 7.《马克思恩格斯全集》:中文版第23~26卷[M].北京:人民出版社,..

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部