期刊文献+

不同血红蛋白输血指征对中老年肿瘤手术患者的影响 被引量:8

The influence of two transfusion triggers on middle-and old-aged patients during tumorectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用不同输血指征管理对中老年消化道肿瘤手术患者的影响。方法选择ASAⅠ—Ⅱ级、年龄45—72岁消化道恶性肿瘤患者80名,随机数字法均分为Ⅰ组:输血指征为Hb 100 g/L;Ⅱ组:输血指征为Hb80 g/L。患者入手术室后常规使用静脉复合气管内吸入麻醉,分别于麻醉前、肿瘤切除后、术毕、术后24 h和出院时测定血常规、血乳酸含量、动脉血气,并记录术中总输血、输液量、输血并发症。结果1)血常规:在肿瘤切除后至手术后24 h,Hb 80 g/L组(Ⅱ组)患者Hb[(89±4.6)g/L]明显低于Hb 100 g/L组[Ⅰ组,(109±5.1)g/L],但在出院时,Ⅰ、Ⅱ组Hb分别为(127±8.3)g/L和(128±6.0)g/L(P>0.05);2)血乳酸浓度:肿瘤切除后2组患者分别从术前的(1.03±0.10)、(1.00±0.08)mmol/L升高为(1.90±0.15)和(1.85±0.19)mmol/L,并持续至出院(P<0.05)。3)动脉血气和血流动力学:2组患者在麻醉前、术后24 h和出院时,动脉氧分压(PaO2):Ⅰ组分别为(82.4±3.8)、(82.3±4.2)、(81.9±3.0)mmHg,Ⅱ组分别为(82.6±3.9)、(80.7±3.3)、(81.8±3.3)mmHg;动脉CO2分压(PaCO2):Ⅰ组分别为(41.0±1.5)、(41.4±2.0)、(41.7±1.5),Ⅱ组分别为(41.3±1.8)、(41.7±1.5)、(41.5±1.6)mmHg;血液pH:Ⅰ组分别为7.41±0.02、7.41±0.01、7.41±0.02,Ⅱ组分别为7.41±0.02、7.42±0.02、7.41±0.02;4)输血和相关并发症等:观察过程中患者无一例死亡。Ⅱ组患者输入浓缩红细胞的比例(22.5%)和输血量[(0.40±0.77)U/例]均显著低于Ⅰ组(分别为47.5%和(0.93±1.00)U/例,P<0.01),但2组患者输液量、输血并发症发生率、术后切口感染率(1/40vs1/40)、延迟愈合率(1/40vs1/40)和住院时间[(11.7±1.0)dvs(11.7±1.0)d]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无脏器功能异常合并症的中老年消化道肿瘤患者,术中将输血指征从Hb 100 g/L降至80 g/L进行管理,能满足机体代谢的需要,显著降低浓缩红细胞输入比例和输入量,同时不增加术后切口感染率及延迟愈合率,不延长患者住院时间,对节约用血有重要意义。 Objective To access the influence of two transfusion triggers during operation on the middle- and old-aged cancer patients. Methods A total of 80 patients with cancer of gastrointestinal (GI) tract, ASA Ⅰ--Ⅱ and aged from 45 to 72 years, were divided into two groups with intraoperative transfusion trigger of hemoglobin (Hb) 100g/L in group Ⅰ , and Hb 80g/L in group Ⅱ. Anesthesia was performed with intravenous injection combined with tracheal inhalation. Blood routine examination, plasma lactic acid levels, and arterial blood gases were tested. Blood transfusion, fluid infusions and complication of blood transfusion were also observed. Results 1 ) Hb levels were significantly lower in group Ⅱ [ (89 ± 4. 6)g/L and(88 ±6.4)g/L] than in group Ⅰ [(109 ±5.1)g/L and(106 ±6.9)g/L] during and 24h after operation. They were, however, similar at discharge [Group Ⅰ :(127 ±8.3)g/L vs. Group Ⅱ : (128±6.0)g/L, P〉0.05]. 2) Blood lactic acid levels increased after operation in both group [ Group Ⅰ : ( 1.90 ±0. 15) mmol/L and Group Ⅱ : ( Ⅰ. 85 ± 0. 19) mmol/L] compared with before anesthesia [Group Ⅰ : ( 1.03 ±0. 10) mmol/L and Group Ⅱ : ( 1.00 ±0.08) mmol/ L, P 〈 0. 01 ] , and they were significantly lower in group Ⅱ than in group Ⅰ during and 24 h after operation ( P 〈 0. 05 ). 3 ) Before anesthesia, 24 h after operation and at discharge, arterial blood gas were as follows: arterial oxygen pressures ( PaO2 ) were ( 82.4 ± 3.8 ) mmHg, ( 82. 3 ± 4.2) mmHg, ( 81.9 ± 3.0 ) mmHg respectively in group Ⅰ , and ( 82.6± 3.9)mmHg, (80. 7 ±23.3) mmHg, (81.8±3.3) mmHg respectively in group Ⅱ ; arterial CO2 pressures were (41.0 ± 1.5 )mmHg,(41.4±2.0) mmHg,(41.7 ± 1.5) mmHg respectively in Group Ⅰ , and(41.3 ±1.8) mmHg,(41.7 ± 1.5) mmHg, (41.5 ± 1.6) mmHg respectively in group Ⅱ ; blood pH were 7.41 ±0. 02,7.41 ± 0. 01, and 7.41 ± 0. 02 respectively in group Ⅰ , and 7.41 ±0. 02,7.42 ±0.02,7.41±0. 02 respectively in group Ⅱ. 4) No death occured during the study. Blood transfusion were significantly higher in group Ⅰ [47.5% and (0. 93 ± 1.00)U/per patient] than these in group Ⅱ [22. 5% and (0.40 ±0. 77)U/per patient, P 〈0.05]. But we failed to find any differences in the amount of fluid infusion and the incidence of transfusion complications (group Ⅰ : Group Ⅱ = 1/40 : 1/40 of wound infection and 1/40 vs 1/40 of prolonged wound healing) between the two groups (P 〉0. 05). There was also no difference in hospitalization days between group Ⅰ [ ( 11.7 ±1.0) days ] and group Ⅱ [ ( 11.7 ± 1.0) days, P 〉 0. 05 ]. Conclusion To the middle- and old-aged GI cancer patients without organ dysfunction, lowering blood transfusion trigger from Hb 100 g/L to Hb 80 g/L during operation can meet the requirement of oxygen, reduce blood transfusion, and do not increase the rates of wound infection or delay wound healing.
出处 《中国输血杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期632-636,共5页 Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
基金 国家自然科学基金资助课题(No.30772153 30872455)
关键词 恶性肿瘤 消化道 中老年患者 手术 输血指征 血红蛋白(Hb) 红细胞压积(Hct) 输血并发症 Hemoglobin Middle- and old-aged Transfusion trigger Complication of blood transfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Office of Medical Applications of Research, National lnstiutes of Health. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion. JAMA, 1988, 260 ( 18 ) :2700-2703.
  • 2Vide MK, Weiskopf RB. What can we learn about the need for transfusion from patients who refuse blood? The experience with Jehovah's Witnesses. Transfusion, 1994,34(5) :396-401.
  • 3American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood transfusion and adjuvant therapies: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies. Anesthesiology, 2006,105 ( 1 ) : 198-208.
  • 4.临床输血技术规范.[S].中华人民共和国卫生部,2000-06..
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.卫生部关于印发医院感染诊断标准(试行)的通知.2001-01-03.
  • 6Toy P, Popovsky MA, Abraham E, et al. Transfusion-related acute lung injury : definition and review. Crit Care Med 2005 ; 33 (12) :721-726.
  • 7Weiskopf RB, Kramer JH, Viele M, et al. Acute severe isovolemic anemia impairs cognitive function and memory in humans. Anesthesiology, 2000,92(6) :1646-1652.
  • 8Segawa H, Moil K, Kasai K, et al. The role of the phrenie nerves in stress response in upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg, 1996,82(8) : 1215-1224.
  • 9Offiner PL. Age of bood: does it make a difference? Cfit Care, 2004,8 ( Suppl 2) : S24-S26.
  • 10Ho J, Sibbald WJ, Chin-Yee IH. Effects of storage on efficacy of red cell transfusion: when is it not safe? Crit Care Med, 2003,31 (Suppl) : S687-S697.

共引文献49

同被引文献116

引证文献8

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部