对行政诉讼协调和解结案方式的思考

Reflections on the Way to Wind up Administrative Lawsuit Cases through Mediation and Conciliation

人民法院通过协调促使当事人"合意和解",并以原告撤诉的方式使案件"案结事了"的做法近年来被广为推崇。然而,由于协调和解制度在立法上的缺失,使得该结案方式的合法性难以确认,也不利于保障行政诉讼目的的实现。实践中,应将行政诉讼协调和解结案方式以规范的形式确定下来,如制作格式化诉讼协调和解的法律文书、限定"协调和解裁定书"的适用范围、确立瑕疵和解协议的救济途径等,真正发挥协调机制对行政审判职能的促进作用。

In recent years, it has been highly praised that the people＇s court winds up some cases by making the litigant consent conciliation and the prosecutor drop law suits. But this way of winding up a case is difficult to affirm due to the mediation and conciliation system lacking a legislative basis. In practice, this way of winding up a case should be set in a standard form, for instance, making formatting legal documents of lawsuit mediation and conciliation, limiting a scope of application of the ＂mediation and conciliation award＂ and setting a relief sewer for faulty conciliation agreements, so as to give play to the co-ordinative mechanism promoting administrative judicial functions.