期刊文献+

CT模拟软件的质量保证

Quality Assurance for CT-simulation Software
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:CT-SIM模拟软件作为几何模拟的重要工具,其精确度和完整性应是目前三维立体放射治疗中首要考虑的问题之一。本文旨在研究和探讨CT模拟软件的质量保证和质量控制(quality assurance and quality control,QA&QC)的检测方法。材料与方法:利用飞利浦BrillianceTMCT模拟机对QUASARTM模体和QUASAR多叶准直器束流几何模体分别实施扫描,通过在ACQSim工作站软件中来实现以下几项质控检测:(1)等中心计算和空间/几何精度检测;(2)图像重建精度测试;(3)DRR几何精确度的评估;(4)射野几何学和MLC精度的测量。结果:(1)用QUASAR模体检测模拟软件等中心计算及空间/几何计算精度,偏差均小于1mm。(2)所测量的模体插件体积与标称值相比较:大正方体为1.24%,小正方体为1.76%,楔形空腔体积为2.1%,大球体相差-0.44%,中球体为0.56%,小球体为13.68%。(3)在DRR图像中测量出最里面的丙烯酸材料的矩形面积为0.9cm×1.9cm,中间空气腔矩形面积为10cm×9.9cm,外面丙烯酸材料的矩形面积为14.7cm×14.8cm。(4)照射野的MLC与模体的几何精度误差基本保持在±1mm精度。结论:CT模拟软件的QA在CT模拟定位系统质量保证中应占有十分重要地位,其直接影响到放疗定位的精确度和治疗的准确性。 Objective: With the CT-simulation software being an important tool for the geometry simulation, its accuracy and integrity should be firstly considered. The purpose of this study is to provide a series of methods about quality assurance and quality control for CT-simulation software. Material and Methods: The QUASAR and QUASAR^TM MLC Beam Geometry phantom were scanned independently by using Philips Brilliance^TM CT simulator. In the ACQSim workstation, there were the following measurements to be done. (1)The isocenter calculation and the spatial/geometry accuracy tests. (2)The accuracy tests for the image reconstruction. (3)Evaluation of the digitally reconstructed radiographs(DRRs). (4) Evaluation of the accuracy of beam and MLC. Results: (1)To evaluate the isocenter calculation and the spatial/geometry accuracy using QUASAR phantom, make sure that the tolerance limits were within ±1mm. (2)The comparison with the measured and nominal values showed that, the error was 1.24% for the big cube. And the errors for the small cube were 1.76%, 2.1% for the wedge cavity, - 0.44% for the big sphere, 0.56% for the middle sphere and 13.68% for the small sphere. (3) The measured values of the inner acrylic rectangle, the air square and the outer acrylic square were 0.9 cm ×1.9 cm, 10cm×9.9cm, and 14.7cm×14.8 cm respectively. (4)The errors between the field sizes and the phantom geometry were kept within ±1 mm. Conclusions: Quality assurance of CT-Simulation software plays an extremely important part in the CT-Simulation system. And its results would directly influence the accuracy of patient setup and the precision of radiation treatment.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2009年第5期1371-1375,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 CT模拟软件 质量保证 质量控制 CT-Simulation software quality assurance quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Mutic S, Paha JR, Butker EK, et al. Quality assurance for computedtomography simulators and the compute-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No.66 [J]. Med Phys, 2003,30(10):2762-2792.
  • 2Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, et al. AAPM report No.53.Quality assurmace for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning [J]. Med Phys, 1998, 25:656-661.
  • 3柏森,徐庆丰,钟仁明,蒋晓芹,姜庆丰,许峰.用PrecisePLAN系统分析锥形束CT图像体积精度[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(6):466-468. 被引量:1
  • 4邓小武,黄劭敏,祁振宇.CT模拟机的质量控制和质量保证检验[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(9):546-550. 被引量:33

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]AAPM.AAPM report No.83.Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomographysimulation process[J].Med Phys,2003,30:2762-2792.
  • 2[2]Curry TS,Dawdey JE,Murry RC.Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology [M].4th ed.PA,Malvern:Lea & Febiger,1990.
  • 3[3]Cozzi L,Fogliata A,Buffa F.Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy [J].Radiother Oncol,1998,48:335-338.
  • 4[4]Williams TR,Thwaites TI.Radiotherapy physics in practice [M].2nd ed.Oxford:Oxford University press,2000.118-149.
  • 5[5]Constantinouc,Harrington JC,DeWerd LA.An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers [J].Med Phys,1992,19(2):325-332.
  • 6[6]Cozzi L,Fogliata A,Buffa F,et al.Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy [J].Radiother Oncol,1998,48:335-338.
  • 7[7]Beneventis,Chionne F,Gobbi G,et al.Quantitative CT to mography for radiotherapy treatment planning:calibration phantom and sources of error[J].Radiother Oncol,1995,37 (Suppl):41.
  • 8[8]NCRP.NCRP Report No.99.Quality assurance for diagnostic imaging equipment [R].Bathesda MD:National Councilon Radiation Protection and Measurements,1988.
  • 9[10]Nagata Y,Nishidai Ade M,CT simulator:a new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy [J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1990,18:505-518.
  • 10[11]Sherouse G,Mosher KL,Novins K,et al.Virtual simulation:concept and implementation [A].Bruinvis LAD.North-Holland:Ninth International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy [C].1987.433-436.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部