期刊文献+

论定罪量刑的社会学模式 被引量:11

Study on The Sociological Model of Conviction and Sentencing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现行刑事立法赋予法官享有一定的定罪量刑自由裁量权,该自由裁量权受诸多案件社会结构因素影响,案件社会结构因素影响定罪量刑的过程及其表现出的样式就是定罪量刑社会学模式。定罪量刑的社会学模式以案件社会学理论为参照,并基本被实证研究所证实。由于同性质的具体案件的社会结构不同或同一案件在不同诉讼阶段的社会结构不同,法官受其影响程度也不同,定罪量刑不公正现象由此而生。实现公正定罪量刑的关键在于避免定罪量刑社会学模式发生作用。 Modern criminal statutes provide that a judge can exercise discretion in conviction and sentencing. However, such discretion is affected by many social factors connected with a case and the very process that the social structural factors influence the conviction and sentencing in a case and the pattern they reveals is called the sociological mode of conviction and sentencing, which is based on criminological and sociological theory and has nearly certified with positive studies. Since cases of the same nature may be of different social structural factors or the same ease may also be of different social structural factors in the different litigation phases, the influence that the judge acquires differs and thus discrimination in the judicial process seems inevitable. The key point to avoid the injustice is to ensure no occurrence of the sociological mode of conviction and sentencing.
作者 汪明亮
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期78-90,共13页 Modern Law Science
关键词 定罪量刑社会学模式 定罪量刑不公正 自由裁量权 案件社会结构 sociological model of conviction and sentencing discrimination in the judicial process discretion social structure of a case
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1H. L. A. Hart. The concept of law[ M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1961.
  • 2Donald Black. Sociological Justice [ M ]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1989:6.
  • 3Roscoe Pound. Law in books and law in action [ J ]. American law review 44:1910.
  • 4汪明亮.论法官解释-兼论“瑕疵”刑法规范的适用[C]//赵秉志.中国刑法学年会文集.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003:584-585.
  • 5Barbara J Fields. Ideology and race in American history[ J]. J. Morgan Kousser and James M. McPherson. Region, Race,and Reconstruction:Essays in Honor of C. Vann Woodward[ C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982:147 - 177.
  • 6Bowers and Pierce. Arbitrariness and discrimination under post - Furman capital statutes [ J ]. Crime and Delinquency 26 : 1980 .
  • 7Donald Black. The Behavior of Law [ M ]. New York : Academic Press, 1976 : 17 - 20.
  • 8Gross and Mauro. Patterns of death:an analysis of racial disparities in capital sentencing and homicide victimization [ J ]. Stanford Law Review 37:1984.
  • 9William M. O' Barr. Linguistic Evidence : Language, Power,and Strategy in the Courtroom [ M ]. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
  • 10Donald Black. Social control as a dependent variable[ A ]. Donald Black. Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Volume 1 : Fundamentals [ C ]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984:21 - 22.

二级参考文献42

  • 1潘菽.略论心理学的科学体系[J].中国社会科学,1986(4):135-142. 被引量:3
  • 2季卫东.法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993(1):83-103. 被引量:745
  • 3龚祥瑞,李克强.法律工作的计算机化[J].法学杂志,1983,4(3):16-20. 被引量:43
  • 4[2]Izard C. Human emotion[ M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.
  • 5[3]Russell R. A circumplex model of affect[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980:39.
  • 6[7][17][美]诺尔曼·丹森.情感论[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
  • 7[8][15][18][美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律理论的前沿[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 8[9]Jerome Michael and Mortimer J. Adler, Crime, Law and social science[M]. New York:Harcourt, Brace Press, 1933.
  • 9[12][美]弗兰克.审判中的法庭[M].美国:普林斯顿大学出版社,1949.
  • 10[美]汉斯@托奇.司法和犯罪心理学[M].周嘉桂,译.北京:群众出版社,1986.145.

共引文献82

同被引文献175

引证文献11

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部