期刊文献+

建立国际投资仲裁的上诉机制问题析评 被引量:26

On Establishing an Appellate Mechanism of International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,国际投资仲裁案件迅猛增加,不仅使东道国主权面临挑战,也引起出现有投资条约的诸多设计缺陷所导致的仲裁合法性危机。改造投资仲裁机制已经不再仅仅停留在学术争鸣阶段而是迅速发展到具体的条约改革实践阶段。其中,建立仲裁的上诉机制就是这种改革实践的一种具体表现。建立仲裁的上诉机制是对传统投资仲裁体制的重大变革,尚存在许多理论争议和政治及法律障碍,但由于这种改革已经进入实践阶段并由美国积极倡导,势必对国际投资争端解决的未来发展趋势产生重要影响。 In recent years, an enormous increase of international investment arbitration not only challenges the sovereignty of host states, but also exposes the legitimacy problems of arbitration arising out of the defects of the design of existing investment treaties. Reform of international investment arbitration mechanism is thus no longer an academic and theoretical issue, but a practical process of treaty makings, of which establishment of an appellate review mechanism has drawn much attention. The appellate review seems an important reform to traditional investment arbitration system. Though far from matured in theory, politics or law, it is advocated and experienced positively in the USA and will inevitably produce a great influence for the future of international investment dispute resolution.
作者 刘笋
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期122-130,共9页 Modern Law Science
基金 国家社科基金资助项目(05BFX050)
关键词 国际投资 国际投资仲裁 上诉机制 international investment international investment arbitration appellate mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States - Chile Free Trade Agreement [J]. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev,Vol. 19,2004, p. 708 - 740.
  • 2Doak Bishop, The Case for an Appellate Panel and its Scope of Review [ J ]. Transnatl Disp. Mgmt, Vol. 2,2005, p.10.
  • 3Susan Frank, The Legitimacy Crisis in International Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions [ J]. Fordham L. Rev, Vol. 73, 2005, p. 1607.
  • 4刘笋.国际投资仲裁引发的若干危机及应对之策述评[J].法学研究,2008,30(6):141-154. 被引量:52
  • 5Erin E. Gleason, International Arbitral Appeals : What Are We So Afraid Of? [ J]. Pepp. Disp. Resol. L. J, Vol. 7,2007, footnote 98.
  • 6Erin E. Gleason, International Arbitral Appeals : What Are We So Afraid Of? [J]. Pepp. Disp. Resol. L. J, Vol. 7,2007,p. 284.
  • 7William H. Knult Ⅲ and Noah D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option [ J]. Am. Rev. Int'l Arb, Vol. 11,2000, p. 542.
  • 8William H. Knull III and Noah D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option [ J ]. Am. Rev. Intl Arb, Vol. 11,2000, p. 547.
  • 9David A. Gantz, An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor - State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges [ J]. Vand. J. Transnat'l L, Vol. 39,2006, p. 51-52.
  • 10David A. Gantz, An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor - State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges [ J]. Vand. J. Transnat'l L, Vol. 39,2006, p. 52-53.

二级参考文献51

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:37
  • 2刘笋.国际投资与环境保护的法律冲突与协调——以晚近区域性投资条约及相关案例为研究对象[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):34-44. 被引量:25
  • 3Samrat Ganguly, The In-vestor-- State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and A Sovereign ' s Power to Protect Public Health, 38 Colum. J. Transnat 'I. L. 116(1999).
  • 4J. C. Thomas, Investor--State Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11, 37 Canadian Year Book of Int'l Law (1999).
  • 5Jose E. Alvarez,Critical Theory and the North American Free Trade Agreement's Chapter Eleven, 28 U. Miami Inter--Am. L. Rev. 303, 307 (1997).
  • 6Samrat Ganguly, The In-vestor-- State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and A Sovereign ' s Power to Protect Public Health, 38 Colum. J. Transnat 'I. L. 119(1999).
  • 7David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions : From NAFTA to the United States --Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 684 (2004).
  • 8Mondev Int'l Ltd. v. United States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/2, Award (Oct. 11, 2002); Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/98/3, Award (June 26, 2003) ; Azinian v. Mexico, 14 ICSID Rev. --Foreign Inv. L. J. , 1999.
  • 9Charles H. Brower II, Investor-- State Disputes Under NAFTA : TheEmpire Strikes Back, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 43--44 (2001).
  • 10Guillermo Aguilar AIvarez & William W. Park, The New Face of Investment Arbitration : NAFTA Chapter 11, 28 The Yale Journal of Int'l L. 388 (2003).

共引文献51

同被引文献332

引证文献26

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部