期刊文献+

新“科玄”之争的认识论根源 被引量:6

On the Epistemological Reflection of the Latest Debate upon Science and Metaphysics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 因"索卡尔事件"引起的科玄论争,是世纪之交以来爆发的规模最大的论争。新"科玄"之争存在深刻的认识论根源。只有对科学进行准确定位,对知识系统进行分类并还数学与逻辑学知识王国的桂冠地位,才能使反科学与伪科学无处遁形,知识王国内的纷争才能趋于有序。 It is the biggest debate in science and metaphysics caused by Sokal incident in the latest turn of century. The debates have incisive epistemological causes. Only when we define science accurately, classify sorts of knowledge, establish the status of Mathematics and Logics as referees in the knowledge kingdom can we leave have no hiding place for the anti -science and pseudo -science and disputes in the knowledge kingdom will tend to be in order.
作者 赵克
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期100-105,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词 科学 玄学 论争 认识论 science metaphysics debate epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[美]拉瑞·劳丹,.进步及其问题[M]华夏出版社,1999.
  • 2[美]蒯因(Quine,W·) 著,江天骥等.从逻辑的观点看[M]上海译文出版社,1987.

同被引文献34

  • 1赵克.科技人才开发是落实自主创新国策的重要步骤——基于上海科学共同体与学科建设的一个经验研究[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2007(8):70-76. 被引量:2
  • 2Godehard Link, One Hundred Years of Russell's Paradox: Mathematics, Logic, Philosophy, Walter de Gruyter, 2004, p. 350.
  • 3B. Russell, The Principles of Mathematics, W. W. Norton & Company, 1903, p. 101, Preface, pp. vi -vii.
  • 4B. Rang, and W. Thomas, "Zermelo' s Discovery of the ' Russell Paradox' ", Historia Mathematica, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1981, pp. 15 -22.
  • 5R. Dedekind, The Nature and Meaning of Numbers, 1887, Dover republication, 1963, p. 31.
  • 6G. Peano, Principles of Arithmetic, 1889 in van Heijenoort, 1967, p. 85.
  • 7G. Frege, Begriffsschrifi, 1879 in van Heijenoort, 1967, p. 5.
  • 8G.弗雷格.《算术基础》,王路译,王炳文校,商务印书馆,2001,P.8.
  • 9A. N. Whitehead, & B. Russell, Principia Mathematica, Cambridge, at the University Press, 1910, Vol. Ⅰ.
  • 10A. N. Whitehead, & B. Russell, Principia Mathematica, Cambridge, at the University Press, 1910, Vol. Ⅱ.

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部